# NumberingData – full data extract

Reference data on North American phone numbering, compiled as an independent project from primary records of NANPA, the Canadian Numbering Administrator and the US Federal Trade Commission. Generated 2026-11-01.

Short version of this file, with sources and licence: https://numberingdata.com/llms.txt
Machine-readable downloads: https://numberingdata.com/datasets/area-codes.json, https://numberingdata.com/datasets/area-codes.csv, https://numberingdata.com/datasets/canadian-cities.csv

## READ BEFORE QUOTING ANY NUMBER BELOW

1. Carrier share is share of allocated NUMBER BLOCKS, not of subscribers. Numbers move with people when they switch carriers, so this does not say who serves those customers.
2. Complaint counts cover 28 Sep – 30 Oct 2026 – 33 days, 282,276 complaints in total. That is all the FTC publishes at a time. Never present it as an annual figure.
3. A complaint names the caller ID that was displayed. Spam callers fake it, so a high count means a code is imitated often; it says nothing about where calls come from or about people who hold numbers in it.
4. Ranks are among the 422 codes with five or more complaints in that window, not among all codes.
5. Maximum blocks per code: 786 in the US, 800 in Canada. "blocks unknown" means the code is Canadian and block data comes from the CNA in a different file.
6. Where blocks are 0 of 786, no subscriber can hold a number in that code, so a caller ID showing one is necessarily spoofed.
7. There are no US city entries: NANPA records US blocks against rate centers truncated to ten characters (CHAMPAURBN, NWYRCYZN01) which in large metros are telephone zones, not places. Canadian exchange areas are real place names and are used as such.
8. Nothing here identifies the holder of a phone number. This is not a people-search dataset.

## Area codes (437)

- 201; New Jersey (US); in service since 1947; blocks 779/786 (99.1%); top holder Verizon 52.1%; complaints 884 (rank 65/422); overlays with 551; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/201
- 202; District of Columbia (US); in service since 1947; blocks 784/786 (99.7%); top holder Verizon 57.1%; complaints 1377 (rank 10/422); overlays with 771; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/202
- 203; Connecticut (US); in service since 1947; blocks 784/786 (99.7%); top holder AT&T 55.7%; complaints 537 (rank 198/422); overlays with 475; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/203
- 204; Manitoba (CA); in service since 1947; blocks 781/800 (97.6%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 72.5%; complaints 357 (rank 274/422); overlays with 431/584; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/204
- 205; Alabama (US); in service since 1947; blocks 785/786 (99.9%); top holder AT&T 44.1%; complaints 901 (rank 62/422); overlays with 659; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/205
- 206; Washington (US); in service since 1947; blocks 752/786 (95.7%); top holder Lumen 37.9%; complaints 812 (rank 95/422); overlays with 564; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/206
- 207; Maine (US); in service since 1947; blocks 742/786 (94.4%); top holder Consolidated 40.4%; complaints 511 (rank 207/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/207
- 208; Idaho (US); in service since 1947; blocks 785/786 (99.9%); top holder Lumen 30.1%; complaints 1255 (rank 15/422); overlays with 986; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/208
- 209; California (US); in service since 1958; blocks 784/786 (99.7%); top holder AT&T 40.9%; complaints 933 (rank 50/422); overlays with 350; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/209
- 210; Texas (US); in service since 1992; blocks 784/786 (99.7%); top holder AT&T 54.8%; complaints 760 (rank 118/422); overlays with 726; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/210
- 212; New York (US); in service since 1947; blocks 784/786 (99.7%); top holder Verizon 86.9%; complaints 214 (rank 334/422); overlays with 332/646/917; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/212
- 213; California (US); in service since 1947; blocks 786/786 (100%); top holder AT&T 28.4%; complaints 925 (rank 54/422); overlays with 323/738; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/213
- 214; Texas (US); in service since 1947; blocks 785/786 (99.9%); top holder AT&T 52.1%; complaints 795 (rank 103/422); overlays with 469/945/972; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/214
- 215; Pennsylvania (US); in service since 1947; blocks 783/786 (99.6%); top holder Verizon 67%; complaints 838 (rank 86/422); overlays with 267/445; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/215
- 216; Ohio (US); in service since 1947; blocks 613/786 (78%); top holder AT&T 44%; complaints 848 (rank 80/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/216
- 217; Illinois (US); in service since 1947; blocks 786/786 (100%); top holder AT&T 27.9%; complaints 2562 (rank 1/422); overlays with 447; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/217
- 218; Minnesota (US); in service since 1947; blocks 708/786 (90.1%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 35.6%; complaints 275 (rank 315/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/218
- 219; Indiana (US); in service since 1948; blocks 495/786 (63%); top holder AT&T 30.3%; complaints 495 (rank 213/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/219
- 220; Ohio (US); in service since 2015; blocks 142/786 (18.1%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 29.6%; complaints 305 (rank 298/422); overlays with 740; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/220
- 223; Pennsylvania (US); in service since 2017; blocks 252/786 (32.1%); top holder Onvoy 30.6%; complaints 249 (rank 322/422); overlays with 717; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/223
- 224; Illinois (US); in service since 2002; blocks 595/786 (75.7%); top holder AT&T 25.5%; complaints 667 (rank 149/422); overlays with 847; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/224
- 225; Louisiana (US); in service since 1998; blocks 501/786 (63.7%); top holder AT&T 46.1%; complaints 842 (rank 85/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/225
- 226; Ontario (CA); in service since 2006; blocks 778/800 (97.2%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 31.6%; complaints 315 (rank 292/422); overlays with 382/519/548; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/226
- 227; Maryland (US); in service since 2023; blocks 142/786 (18.1%); top holder AT&T 30.3%; complaints 70 (rank 382/422); overlays with 240/301; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/227
- 228; Mississippi (US); in service since 1997; blocks 275/786 (35%); top holder AT&T 36.4%; complaints 410 (rank 244/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/228
- 229; Georgia (US); in service since 2000; blocks 685/786 (87.2%); top holder AT&T 32.7%; complaints 472 (rank 218/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/229
- 231; Michigan (US); in service since 1999; blocks 572/786 (72.8%); top holder AT&T 26.9%; complaints 978 (rank 42/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/231
- 234; Ohio (US); in service since 2000; blocks 398/786 (50.6%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 25.6%; complaints 423 (rank 237/422); overlays with 330; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/234
- 235; Missouri (US); in service since 2024; blocks 41/786 (5.2%); top holder AT&T 39%; complaints 33 (rank 393/422); overlays with 573; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/235
- 236; British Columbia (CA); in service since 2013; blocks 746/800 (93.2%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 32.7%; complaints 532 (rank 200/422); overlays with 250/257/604/672/778; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/236
- 239; Florida (US); in service since 2002; blocks 522/786 (66.4%); top holder Lumen 27.6%; complaints 684 (rank 135/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/239
- 240; Maryland (US); in service since 1997; blocks 785/786 (99.9%); top holder Verizon 23.2%; complaints 599 (rank 172/422); overlays with 227/301; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/240
- 248; Michigan (US); in service since 1997; blocks 784/786 (99.7%); top holder AT&T 45%; complaints 555 (rank 191/422); overlays with 947; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/248
- 249; Ontario (CA); in service since 2011; blocks 587/800 (73.4%); complaints 160 (rank 355/422); overlays with 683/705; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/249
- 250; British Columbia (CA); in service since 1996; blocks 781/800 (97.6%); complaints 322 (rank 289/422); overlays with 236/257/672/778; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/250
- 251; Alabama (US); in service since 2001; blocks 528/786 (67.2%); top holder AT&T 32.8%; complaints 471 (rank 220/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/251
- 252; North Carolina (US); in service since 1998; blocks 695/786 (88.4%); top holder Brightspeed 29.8%; complaints 933 (rank 51/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/252
- 253; Washington (US); in service since 1997; blocks 508/786 (64.6%); top holder Lumen 35.8%; complaints 489 (rank 215/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/253
- 254; Texas (US); in service since 1997; blocks 672/786 (85.5%); top holder AT&T 27.5%; complaints 466 (rank 221/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/254
- 256; Alabama (US); in service since 1998; blocks 786/786 (100%); top holder AT&T 40.7%; complaints 1064 (rank 33/422); overlays with 938; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/256
- 257; British Columbia (CA); in service since 2025; blocks 21/800 (2.6%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 33.3%; overlays with 236/250/604/672/778; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/257
- 260; Indiana (US); in service since 2002; blocks 444/786 (56.5%); top holder Frontier 22.3%; complaints 529 (rank 202/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/260
- 262; Wisconsin (US); in service since 1999; blocks 634/786 (80.7%); top holder AT&T 39%; complaints 675 (rank 145/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/262
- 263; Quebec (CA); in service since 2022; blocks 63/800 (7.9%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 20.6%; overlays with 438/514; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/263
- 267; Pennsylvania (US); in service since 1999; blocks 786/786 (100%); top holder T-Mobile 19.1%; complaints 695 (rank 132/422); overlays with 215/445; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/267
- 269; Michigan (US); in service since 2002; blocks 545/786 (69.3%); top holder AT&T 32.8%; complaints 533 (rank 199/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/269
- 270; Kentucky (US); in service since 1999; blocks 769/786 (97.8%); top holder AT&T 34.6%; complaints 879 (rank 70/422); overlays with 364; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/270
- 272; Pennsylvania (US); in service since 2013; blocks 337/786 (42.9%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 26.7%; complaints 305 (rank 299/422); overlays with 570; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/272
- 273; Quebec (CA); planned, starts 2027-02-27; blocks 0/786 (0%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 100%; overlays with 367/418/581; overlay being planned; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/273
- 274; Wisconsin (US); in service since 2023; blocks 29/786 (3.7%); top holder T-Mobile 37.9%; complaints 10 (rank 402/422); overlays with 920; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/274
- 276; Virginia (US); in service since 2001; blocks 374/786 (47.6%); top holder Verizon 21.1%; complaints 375 (rank 260/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/276
- 279; California (US); in service since 2018; blocks 151/786 (19.2%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 35.1%; complaints 272 (rank 316/422); overlays with 916; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/279
- 281; Texas (US); in service since 1996; blocks 786/786 (100%); top holder AT&T 45.3%; complaints 1020 (rank 38/422); overlays with 346/621/713/832; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/281
- 283; Ohio (US); in service since 2023; blocks 49/786 (6.2%); top holder Onvoy 40.8%; complaints 53 (rank 385/422); overlays with 513; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/283
- 289; Ontario (CA); in service since 2001; blocks 772/800 (96.5%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 25.9%; complaints 401 (rank 250/422); overlays with 365/742/905; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/289
- 301; Maryland (US); in service since 1947; blocks 784/786 (99.7%); top holder Verizon 71%; complaints 477 (rank 217/422); overlays with 227/240; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/301
- 302; Delaware (US); in service since 1947; blocks 656/786 (83.5%); top holder Verizon 41.3%; complaints 682 (rank 137/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/302
- 303; Colorado (US); in service since 1947; blocks 784/786 (99.7%); top holder Lumen 64.8%; complaints 927 (rank 53/422); overlays with 720/983; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/303
- 304; West Virginia (US); in service since 1947; blocks 785/786 (99.9%); top holder Frontier 43.4%; complaints 564 (rank 188/422); overlays with 681; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/304
- 305; Florida (US); in service since 1947; blocks 785/786 (99.9%); top holder AT&T 60.3%; complaints 776 (rank 111/422); overlays with 645/786; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/305
- 306; Saskatchewan (CA); in service since 1947; blocks 777/800 (97.1%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 3%; complaints 361 (rank 271/422); overlays with 474/639; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/306
- 307; Wyoming (US); in service since 1947; blocks 499/786 (63.5%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 32.9%; complaints 382 (rank 256/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/307
- 308; Nebraska (US); in service since 1955; blocks 465/786 (59.2%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 33.1%; complaints 213 (rank 336/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/308
- 309; Illinois (US); in service since 1957; blocks 786/786 (100%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 23.5%; complaints 322 (rank 290/422); overlays with 861; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/309
- 310; California (US); in service since 1991; blocks 786/786 (100%); top holder AT&T 43.6%; complaints 454 (rank 227/422); overlays with 424; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/310
- 312; Illinois (US); in service since 1947; blocks 784/786 (99.7%); top holder AT&T 56.4%; complaints 494 (rank 214/422); overlays with 872; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/312
- 313; Michigan (US); in service since 1947; blocks 769/786 (97.8%); top holder AT&T 46.9%; complaints 672 (rank 146/422); overlays with 679; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/313
- 314; Missouri (US); in service since 1947; blocks 783/786 (99.6%); top holder AT&T 49.7%; complaints 1251 (rank 16/422); overlays with 557; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/314
- 315; New York (US); in service since 1947; blocks 781/786 (99.4%); top holder Verizon 37.9%; complaints 456 (rank 226/422); overlays with 680; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/315
- 316; Kansas (US); in service since 1947; blocks 341/786 (43.4%); top holder AT&T 46.6%; complaints 682 (rank 138/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/316
- 317; Indiana (US); in service since 1947; blocks 786/786 (100%); top holder AT&T 50%; complaints 853 (rank 78/422); overlays with 463; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/317
- 318; Louisiana (US); in service since 1957; blocks 765/786 (97.3%); top holder AT&T 44.3%; complaints 956 (rank 47/422); overlays with 457; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/318
- 319; Iowa (US); in service since 1947; blocks 565/786 (71.9%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 38.8%; complaints 543 (rank 197/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/319
- 320; Minnesota (US); in service since 1996; blocks 511/786 (65%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 30.5%; complaints 306 (rank 296/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/320
- 321; Florida (US); in service since 1999; blocks 502/786 (63.9%); top holder AT&T 28.3%; complaints 1360 (rank 11/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/321
- 323; California (US); in service since 1998; blocks 786/786 (100%); top holder AT&T 41.6%; complaints 677 (rank 142/422); overlays with 213/738; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/323
- 324; Florida (US); in service since 2024; blocks 20/786 (2.5%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 50%; complaints 52 (rank 386/422); overlays with 904; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/324
- 325; Texas (US); in service since 2003; blocks 408/786 (51.9%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 29.2%; complaints 294 (rank 306/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/325
- 326; Ohio (US); in service since 2020; blocks 88/786 (11.2%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 55.7%; complaints 140 (rank 364/422); overlays with 937; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/326
- 327; Arkansas (US); in service since 2024; blocks 43/786 (5.5%); top holder Onvoy 34.9%; complaints 19 (rank 399/422); overlays with 870; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/327
- 329; New York (US); in service since 2023; blocks 70/786 (8.9%); top holder Onvoy 25.7%; complaints 43 (rank 388/422); overlays with 845; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/329
- 330; Ohio (US); in service since 1996; blocks 787/786 (100.1%); top holder AT&T 35.6%; complaints 757 (rank 119/422); overlays with 234; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/330
- 331; Illinois (US); in service since 2007; blocks 224/786 (28.5%); top holder T-Mobile 19.2%; complaints 591 (rank 175/422); overlays with 630; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/331
- 332; New York (US); in service since 2017; blocks 163/786 (20.7%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 22.7%; complaints 212 (rank 337/422); overlays with 212/646/917; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/332
- 334; Alabama (US); in service since 1995; blocks 784/786 (99.7%); top holder AT&T 24.7%; complaints 525 (rank 203/422); overlays with 483; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/334
- 336; North Carolina (US); in service since 1997; blocks 783/786 (99.6%); top holder AT&T 29%; complaints 906 (rank 61/422); overlays with 743; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/336
- 337; Louisiana (US); in service since 1999; blocks 599/786 (76.2%); top holder AT&T 41.9%; complaints 551 (rank 192/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/337
- 339; Massachusetts (US); in service since 2001; blocks 105/786 (13.4%); top holder Verizon 24.8%; complaints 160 (rank 356/422); overlays with 781; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/339
- 340; U.S. Virgin Islands (US); in service since 1997; blocks 58/786 (7.4%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 53.4%; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/340
- 341; California (US); in service since 2019; blocks 113/786 (14.4%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 38.9%; complaints 220 (rank 331/422); overlays with 510; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/341
- 343; Ontario (CA); in service since 2010; blocks 644/800 (80.5%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 31.4%; complaints 188 (rank 349/422); overlays with 613/753; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/343
- 346; Texas (US); in service since 2014; blocks 752/786 (95.7%); top holder T-Mobile 19.5%; complaints 709 (rank 127/422); overlays with 281/621/713/832; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/346
- 347; New York (US); in service since 1999; blocks 784/786 (99.7%); top holder T-Mobile 44.9%; complaints 409 (rank 245/422); overlays with 465/718/917/929; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/347
- 350; California (US); in service since 2022; blocks 88/786 (11.2%); top holder Onvoy 22.7%; complaints 54 (rank 384/422); overlays with 209; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/350
- 351; Massachusetts (US); in service since 2001; blocks 91/786 (11.6%); top holder Onvoy 30.8%; complaints 222 (rank 330/422); overlays with 978; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/351
- 352; Florida (US); in service since 1995; blocks 711/786 (90.5%); top holder AT&T 22.4%; complaints 991 (rank 40/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/352
- 353; Wisconsin (US); in service since 2023; blocks 13/786 (1.7%); top holder Onvoy 76.9%; complaints 41 (rank 389/422); overlays with 608; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/353
- 354; Quebec (CA); in service since 2022; blocks 64/800 (8%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 42.2%; overlays with 450/579; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/354
- 357; California (US); in service since 2025; blocks 9/786 (1.1%); top holder Onvoy 55.6%; overlays with 559; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/357
- 360; Washington (US); in service since 1995; blocks 786/786 (100%); top holder Lumen 37.3%; complaints 970 (rank 44/422); overlays with 564; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/360
- 361; Texas (US); in service since 1999; blocks 538/786 (68.4%); top holder AT&T 38.1%; complaints 636 (rank 162/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/361
- 363; New York (US); in service since 2023; blocks 38/786 (4.8%); top holder Onvoy 34.2%; complaints 38 (rank 390/422); overlays with 516; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/363
- 364; Kentucky (US); in service since 2014; blocks 72/786 (9.2%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 47.2%; complaints 86 (rank 380/422); overlays with 270; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/364
- 365; Ontario (CA); in service since 2013; blocks 706/800 (88.2%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 30.2%; complaints 430 (rank 231/422); overlays with 289/742/905; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/365
- 367; Quebec (CA); in service since 2018; blocks 248/800 (31%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 12.1%; complaints 296 (rank 304/422); overlays with 418/581; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/367
- 369; California (US); in service since 2023; blocks 55/786 (7%); top holder AT&T 23.6%; complaints 48 (rank 387/422); overlays with 707; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/369
- 380; Ohio (US); in service since 2016; blocks 138/786 (17.6%); top holder Onvoy 30.4%; complaints 240 (rank 325/422); overlays with 614; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/380
- 382; Ontario (CA); in service since 2023; blocks 67/800 (8.4%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 34.3%; complaints 22 (rank 398/422); overlays with 226/519/548; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/382
- 385; Utah (US); in service since 2009; blocks 495/786 (63%); top holder AT&T 23%; complaints 566 (rank 187/422); overlays with 801; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/385
- 386; Florida (US); in service since 2001; blocks 461/786 (58.7%); top holder AT&T 31.5%; complaints 799 (rank 100/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/386
- 401; Rhode Island (US); in service since 1947; blocks 581/786 (73.9%); top holder Verizon 39.2%; complaints 562 (rank 190/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/401
- 402; Nebraska (US); in service since 1947; blocks 782/786 (99.5%); top holder Windstream 25.6%; complaints 923 (rank 55/422); overlays with 531; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/402
- 403; Alberta (CA); in service since 1947; blocks 781/800 (97.6%); complaints 359 (rank 273/422); overlays with 368/568/587/780/825; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/403
- 404; Georgia (US); in service since 1947; blocks 784/786 (99.7%); top holder AT&T 50.8%; complaints 942 (rank 49/422); overlays with 470/678/943; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/404
- 405; Oklahoma (US); in service since 1947; blocks 783/786 (99.6%); top holder AT&T 44.6%; complaints 1694 (rank 5/422); overlays with 572; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/405
- 406; Montana (US); in service since 1947; blocks 754/786 (95.9%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 34.6%; complaints 647 (rank 161/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/406
- 407; Florida (US); in service since 1988; blocks 786/786 (100%); top holder AT&T 34%; complaints 1069 (rank 32/422); overlays with 321/689; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/407
- 408; California (US); in service since 1959; blocks 787/786 (100.1%); top holder AT&T 53.9%; complaints 682 (rank 139/422); overlays with 669; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/408
- 409; Texas (US); in service since 1982; blocks 434/786 (55.2%); top holder AT&T 45.9%; complaints 612 (rank 168/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/409
- 410; Maryland (US); in service since 1991; blocks 783/786 (99.6%); top holder Verizon 77.5%; complaints 662 (rank 153/422); overlays with 443/667; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/410
- 412; Pennsylvania (US); in service since 1947; blocks 762/786 (96.9%); top holder Verizon 51%; complaints 830 (rank 90/422); overlays with 878; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/412
- 413; Massachusetts (US); in service since 1947; blocks 605/786 (77%); top holder Verizon 36%; complaints 691 (rank 133/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/413
- 414; Wisconsin (US); in service since 1947; blocks 552/786 (70.2%); top holder AT&T 47.1%; complaints 677 (rank 143/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/414
- 415; California (US); in service since 1947; blocks 785/786 (99.9%); top holder AT&T 53%; complaints 768 (rank 115/422); overlays with 628; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/415
- 416; Ontario (CA); in service since 1947; blocks 779/800 (97.4%); complaints 306 (rank 297/422); overlays with 437/647; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/416
- 417; Missouri (US); in service since 1950; blocks 711/786 (90.5%); top holder AT&T 22.9%; complaints 659 (rank 155/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/417
- 418; Quebec (CA); in service since 1947; blocks 777/800 (97.1%); complaints 341 (rank 284/422); overlays with 367/581; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/418
- 419; Ohio (US); in service since 1947; blocks 783/786 (99.6%); top holder AT&T 21.3%; complaints 614 (rank 167/422); overlays with 567; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/419
- 423; Tennessee (US); in service since 1995; blocks 764/786 (97.2%); top holder AT&T 28.1%; complaints 1346 (rank 12/422); overlays with 729; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/423
- 424; California (US); in service since 2006; blocks 460/786 (58.5%); top holder T-Mobile 21.1%; complaints 631 (rank 163/422); overlays with 310; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/424
- 425; Washington (US); in service since 1997; blocks 628/786 (79.9%); top holder Lumen 22%; complaints 862 (rank 74/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/425
- 428; New Brunswick (CA); in service since 2023; blocks 22/800 (2.8%); complaints 292 (rank 307/422); overlays with 506; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/428
- 430; Texas (US); in service since 2003; blocks 289/786 (36.8%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 29.4%; complaints 214 (rank 335/422); overlays with 903; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/430
- 431; Manitoba (CA); in service since 2012; blocks 584/800 (73%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 28.1%; complaints 258 (rank 318/422); overlays with 204/584; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/431
- 432; Texas (US); in service since 2003; blocks 341/786 (43.4%); top holder AT&T 37%; complaints 487 (rank 216/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/432
- 434; Virginia (US); in service since 2001; blocks 509/786 (64.8%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 24.2%; complaints 860 (rank 75/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/434
- 435; Utah (US); in service since 1997; blocks 501/786 (63.7%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 27.9%; complaints 498 (rank 211/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/435
- 436; Ohio (US); in service since 2024; blocks 0/786 (0%); overlays with 440; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/436
- 437; Ontario (CA); in service since 2013; blocks 563/800 (70.4%); complaints 115 (rank 373/422); overlays with 416/647; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/437
- 438; Quebec (CA); in service since 2006; blocks 608/800 (76%); complaints 305 (rank 300/422); overlays with 263/514; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/438
- 440; Ohio (US); in service since 1997; blocks 757/786 (96.3%); top holder AT&T 26.8%; complaints 879 (rank 71/422); overlays with 436; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/440
- 442; California (US); in service since 2009; blocks 356/786 (45.3%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 25%; complaints 245 (rank 324/422); overlays with 760; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/442
- 443; Maryland (US); in service since 1997; blocks 785/786 (99.9%); top holder Verizon 29.2%; complaints 803 (rank 98/422); overlays with 410/667; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/443
- 445; Pennsylvania (US); in service since 2018; blocks 186/786 (23.7%); top holder Verizon 21.5%; complaints 197 (rank 343/422); overlays with 215/267; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/445
- 447; Illinois (US); in service since 2021; blocks 221/786 (28.1%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 36.2%; complaints 144 (rank 361/422); overlays with 217; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/447
- 448; Florida (US); in service since 2021; blocks 119/786 (15.1%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 32.8%; complaints 200 (rank 342/422); overlays with 850; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/448
- 450; Quebec (CA); in service since 1998; blocks 775/800 (96.9%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 15.6%; complaints 345 (rank 281/422); overlays with 354/579; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/450
- 451; North Carolina (US); planned, starts date not set; blocks 0/786 (0%); overlays with 828; overlay being planned; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/451
- 457; Louisiana (US); in service since 2025; blocks 0/786 (0%); overlays with 318; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/457
- 458; Oregon (US); in service since 2010; blocks 225/786 (28.6%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 28.4%; complaints 205 (rank 339/422); overlays with 541; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/458
- 463; Indiana (US); in service since 2016; blocks 189/786 (24%); top holder Onvoy 27%; complaints 205 (rank 340/422); overlays with 317; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/463
- 464; Illinois (US); in service since 2022; blocks 112/786 (14.2%); top holder AT&T 52.7%; complaints 177 (rank 354/422); overlays with 708; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/464
- 465; New York (US); in service since 2026; blocks 0/786 (0%); overlays with 347/718/917/929; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/465
- 468; Quebec (CA); in service since 2022; blocks 71/800 (8.9%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 52.1%; overlays with 819/873; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/468
- 469; Texas (US); in service since 1999; blocks 786/786 (100%); top holder AT&T 26.5%; complaints 1250 (rank 17/422); overlays with 214/945/972; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/469
- 470; Georgia (US); in service since 2010; blocks 786/786 (100%); top holder Verizon 25.4%; complaints 1211 (rank 21/422); overlays with 404/678/770/943; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/470
- 471; Mississippi (US); in service since 2026; blocks 0/786 (0%); overlays with 662; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/471
- 472; North Carolina (US); in service since 2022; blocks 108/786 (13.7%); top holder AT&T 32.4%; complaints 99 (rank 377/422); overlays with 910; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/472
- 474; Saskatchewan (CA); in service since 2021; blocks 98/800 (12.2%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 19.4%; overlays with 306/639; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/474
- 475; Connecticut (US); in service since 2009; blocks 292/786 (37.2%); top holder Onvoy 22.3%; complaints 442 (rank 229/422); overlays with 203; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/475
- 478; Georgia (US); in service since 2000; blocks 446/786 (56.7%); top holder AT&T 29.6%; complaints 345 (rank 282/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/478
- 479; Arkansas (US); in service since 2002; blocks 569/786 (72.4%); top holder AT&T 41.5%; complaints 420 (rank 239/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/479
- 480; Arizona (US); in service since 1999; blocks 784/786 (99.7%); top holder Lumen 35.2%; complaints 1216 (rank 20/422); overlays with 602/623; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/480
- 483; Alabama (US); in service since 2026; blocks 14/786 (1.8%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 64.3%; overlays with 334; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/483
- 484; Pennsylvania (US); in service since 1999; blocks 786/786 (100%); top holder Windstream 19.7%; complaints 593 (rank 174/422); overlays with 610/835; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/484
- 501; Arkansas (US); in service since 1947; blocks 631/786 (80.3%); top holder AT&T 40.4%; complaints 683 (rank 136/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/501
- 502; Kentucky (US); in service since 1947; blocks 735/786 (93.5%); top holder AT&T 42.3%; complaints 1703 (rank 4/422); overlays with 761; overlay being planned; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/502
- 503; Oregon (US); in service since 1947; blocks 784/786 (99.7%); top holder Lumen 37.2%; complaints 399 (rank 252/422); overlays with 971; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/503
- 504; Louisiana (US); in service since 1947; blocks 563/786 (71.6%); top holder AT&T 49%; complaints 403 (rank 247/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/504
- 505; New Mexico (US); in service since 1947; blocks 685/786 (87.2%); top holder Lumen 32.6%; complaints 584 (rank 176/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/505
- 506; New Brunswick (CA); in service since 1955; blocks 678/800 (84.8%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 36.4%; complaints 328 (rank 288/422); overlays with 428; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/506
- 507; Minnesota (US); in service since 1954; blocks 766/786 (97.5%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 27.7%; complaints 276 (rank 313/422); overlays with 924; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/507
- 508; Massachusetts (US); in service since 1988; blocks 749/786 (95.3%); top holder Verizon 53%; complaints 508 (rank 208/422); overlays with 774; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/508
- 509; Washington (US); in service since 1957; blocks 763/786 (97.1%); top holder Lumen 31.8%; complaints 371 (rank 263/422); overlay being planned; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/509
- 510; California (US); in service since 1991; blocks 785/786 (99.9%); top holder AT&T 48%; complaints 775 (rank 113/422); overlays with 341; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/510
- 512; Texas (US); in service since 1947; blocks 785/786 (99.9%); top holder AT&T 49.9%; complaints 881 (rank 66/422); overlays with 737; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/512
- 513; Ohio (US); in service since 1947; blocks 784/786 (99.7%); top holder Altafiber 33.2%; complaints 847 (rank 82/422); overlays with 283; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/513
- 514; Quebec (CA); in service since 1947; blocks 778/800 (97.2%); complaints 319 (rank 291/422); overlays with 263/438; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/514
- 515; Iowa (US); in service since 1947; blocks 578/786 (73.5%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 30.3%; complaints 859 (rank 76/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/515
- 516; New York (US); in service since 1951; blocks 783/786 (99.6%); top holder Verizon 41.6%; complaints 710 (rank 126/422); overlays with 363; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/516
- 517; Michigan (US); in service since 1947; blocks 616/786 (78.4%); top holder AT&T 25.6%; complaints 627 (rank 164/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/517
- 518; New York (US); in service since 1947; blocks 775/786 (98.6%); top holder Verizon 35.9%; complaints 627 (rank 165/422); overlays with 838; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/518
- 519; Ontario (CA); in service since 1953; blocks 779/800 (97.4%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 14.2%; complaints 290 (rank 310/422); overlays with 226/382/548; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/519
- 520; Arizona (US); in service since 1995; blocks 699/786 (88.9%); top holder Lumen 33.2%; complaints 1592 (rank 6/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/520
- 530; California (US); in service since 1997; blocks 782/786 (99.5%); top holder AT&T 35.9%; complaints 821 (rank 92/422); overlays with 837; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/530
- 531; Nebraska (US); in service since 2011; blocks 267/786 (34%); top holder Onvoy 24%; complaints 224 (rank 329/422); overlays with 402; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/531
- 534; Wisconsin (US); in service since 2010; blocks 98/786 (12.5%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 33.7%; complaints 98 (rank 378/422); overlays with 715; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/534
- 539; Oklahoma (US); in service since 2011; blocks 240/786 (30.5%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 32.5%; complaints 147 (rank 358/422); overlays with 918; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/539
- 540; Virginia (US); in service since 1995; blocks 786/786 (100%); top holder Verizon 35.9%; complaints 792 (rank 104/422); overlays with 826; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/540
- 541; Oregon (US); in service since 1995; blocks 783/786 (99.6%); top holder Lumen 38.7%; complaints 444 (rank 228/422); overlays with 458; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/541
- 548; Ontario (CA); in service since 2016; blocks 515/800 (64.4%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 18.4%; complaints 156 (rank 357/422); overlays with 226/382/519; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/548
- 551; New Jersey (US); in service since 2001; blocks 300/786 (38.2%); top holder T-Mobile 24%; complaints 648 (rank 159/422); overlays with 201; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/551
- 557; Missouri (US); in service since 2022; blocks 84/786 (10.7%); top holder AT&T 45.2%; complaints 24 (rank 397/422); overlays with 314; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/557
- 559; California (US); in service since 1998; blocks 785/786 (99.9%); top holder AT&T 41%; complaints 698 (rank 131/422); overlays with 357; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/559
- 561; Florida (US); in service since 1996; blocks 786/786 (100%); top holder AT&T 38.8%; complaints 1120 (rank 27/422); overlays with 728; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/561
- 562; California (US); in service since 1997; blocks 702/786 (89.3%); top holder Frontier 22.5%; complaints 800 (rank 99/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/562
- 563; Iowa (US); in service since 2001; blocks 388/786 (49.4%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 39.2%; complaints 352 (rank 277/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/563
- 564; Washington (US); in service since 2017; blocks 97/786 (12.3%); top holder T-Mobile 23.7%; complaints 188 (rank 350/422); overlays with 206/360; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/564
- 565; Georgia (US); planned, starts 2027-12-06; blocks 0/786 (0%); overlays with 912; overlay being planned; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/565
- 567; Ohio (US); in service since 2002; blocks 421/786 (53.6%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 23.3%; complaints 361 (rank 272/422); overlays with 419; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/567
- 568; Alberta (CA); planned, starts 2028-06-10; blocks 0/786 (0%); overlays with 368/403/587/780/825; overlay being planned; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/568
- 570; Pennsylvania (US); in service since 1998; blocks 782/786 (99.5%); top holder Verizon 35.4%; complaints 991 (rank 41/422); overlays with 272; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/570
- 571; Virginia (US); in service since 2000; blocks 639/786 (81.3%); top holder Verizon 24.1%; complaints 975 (rank 43/422); overlays with 703; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/571
- 572; Oklahoma (US); in service since 2021; blocks 117/786 (14.9%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 53%; complaints 292 (rank 308/422); overlays with 405; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/572
- 573; Missouri (US); in service since 1996; blocks 786/786 (100%); top holder AT&T 32.3%; complaints 849 (rank 79/422); overlays with 235; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/573
- 574; Indiana (US); in service since 2002; blocks 403/786 (51.3%); top holder AT&T 25.1%; complaints 748 (rank 121/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/574
- 575; New Mexico (US); in service since 2007; blocks 521/786 (66.3%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 26.9%; complaints 891 (rank 63/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/575
- 579; Quebec (CA); in service since 2010; blocks 645/800 (80.6%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 26.4%; complaints 195 (rank 344/422); overlays with 354/450; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/579
- 580; Oklahoma (US); in service since 1997; blocks 741/786 (94.3%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 35.1%; complaints 366 (rank 266/422); overlay being planned; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/580
- 581; Quebec (CA); in service since 2008; blocks 778/800 (97.2%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 20.7%; complaints 308 (rank 295/422); overlays with 367/418; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/581
- 582; Pennsylvania (US); in service since 2021; blocks 154/786 (19.6%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 33.1%; complaints 135 (rank 367/422); overlays with 814; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/582
- 584; Manitoba (CA); in service since 2022; blocks 35/800 (4.4%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 28.6%; overlays with 204/431; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/584
- 585; New York (US); in service since 2001; blocks 676/786 (86%); top holder Frontier 28.8%; complaints 301 (rank 301/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/585
- 586; Michigan (US); in service since 2001; blocks 546/786 (69.5%); top holder AT&T 33.9%; complaints 386 (rank 255/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/586
- 587; Alberta (CA); in service since 2008; blocks 779/800 (97.4%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 16.6%; complaints 390 (rank 254/422); overlays with 368/403/568/780/825; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/587
- 601; Mississippi (US); in service since 1947; blocks 783/786 (99.6%); top holder AT&T 42%; complaints 804 (rank 97/422); overlays with 769; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/601
- 602; Arizona (US); in service since 1947; blocks 748/786 (95.2%); top holder Lumen 37.8%; complaints 931 (rank 52/422); overlays with 480/623; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/602
- 603; New Hampshire (US); in service since 1947; blocks 752/786 (95.7%); top holder Consolidated 33%; complaints 402 (rank 248/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/603
- 604; British Columbia (CA); in service since 1947; blocks 781/800 (97.6%); complaints 375 (rank 261/422); overlays with 236/257/672/778; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/604
- 605; South Dakota (US); in service since 1947; blocks 745/786 (94.8%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 49.1%; complaints 236 (rank 327/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/605
- 606; Kentucky (US); in service since 1955; blocks 639/786 (81.3%); top holder AT&T 23.8%; complaints 546 (rank 195/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/606
- 607; New York (US); in service since 1954; blocks 548/786 (69.7%); top holder Verizon 26.8%; complaints 425 (rank 234/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/607
- 608; Wisconsin (US); in service since 1955; blocks 785/786 (99.9%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 28.3%; complaints 498 (rank 212/422); overlays with 353; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/608
- 609; New Jersey (US); in service since 1957; blocks 780/786 (99.2%); top holder Verizon 41%; complaints 1151 (rank 23/422); overlays with 640; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/609
- 610; Pennsylvania (US); in service since 1994; blocks 782/786 (99.5%); top holder Verizon 57.4%; complaints 1030 (rank 36/422); overlays with 484/835; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/610
- 612; Minnesota (US); in service since 1947; blocks 590/786 (75.1%); top holder Lumen 28%; complaints 356 (rank 275/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/612
- 613; Ontario (CA); in service since 1947; blocks 772/800 (96.5%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 7.5%; complaints 366 (rank 267/422); overlays with 343/753; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/613
- 614; Ohio (US); in service since 1947; blocks 777/786 (98.9%); top holder AT&T 42.6%; complaints 1157 (rank 22/422); overlays with 380; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/614
- 615; Tennessee (US); in service since 1954; blocks 781/786 (99.4%); top holder AT&T 43%; complaints 1034 (rank 35/422); overlays with 629; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/615
- 616; Michigan (US); in service since 1947; blocks 545/786 (69.3%); top holder AT&T 34.5%; complaints 544 (rank 196/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/616
- 617; Massachusetts (US); in service since 1947; blocks 768/786 (97.7%); top holder Verizon 56.6%; complaints 427 (rank 233/422); overlays with 857; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/617
- 618; Illinois (US); in service since 1947; blocks 786/786 (100%); top holder AT&T 28.6%; complaints 848 (rank 81/422); overlays with 730; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/618
- 619; California (US); in service since 1982; blocks 785/786 (99.9%); top holder AT&T 39%; complaints 682 (rank 140/422); overlays with 858; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/619
- 620; Kansas (US); in service since 2001; blocks 705/786 (89.7%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 38.3%; complaints 833 (rank 88/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/620
- 621; Texas (US); in service since 2025; blocks 0/786 (0%); overlays with 281/346/713/832; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/621
- 623; Arizona (US); in service since 1999; blocks 314/786 (39.9%); top holder Lumen 35.4%; complaints 598 (rank 173/422); overlays with 480/602; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/623
- 624; New York (US); in service since 2023; blocks 0/786 (0%); overlays with 716; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/624
- 626; California (US); in service since 1997; blocks 737/786 (93.8%); top holder AT&T 30.5%; complaints 919 (rank 56/422); overlay being planned; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/626
- 628; California (US); in service since 2015; blocks 193/786 (24.6%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 26.9%; complaints 419 (rank 240/422); overlays with 415; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/628
- 629; Tennessee (US); in service since 2015; blocks 197/786 (25.1%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 25.4%; complaints 192 (rank 347/422); overlays with 615; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/629
- 630; Illinois (US); in service since 1996; blocks 782/786 (99.5%); top holder AT&T 54%; complaints 844 (rank 84/422); overlays with 331; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/630
- 631; New York (US); in service since 1999; blocks 782/786 (99.5%); top holder Verizon 43.1%; complaints 819 (rank 94/422); overlays with 934; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/631
- 636; Missouri (US); in service since 1999; blocks 435/786 (55.3%); top holder AT&T 36.3%; complaints 367 (rank 265/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/636
- 639; Saskatchewan (CA); in service since 2013; blocks 776/800 (97%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 19.7%; complaints 298 (rank 302/422); overlays with 306/474; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/639
- 640; New Jersey (US); in service since 2018; blocks 134/786 (17%); top holder AT&T 26.1%; complaints 239 (rank 326/422); overlays with 609; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/640
- 641; Iowa (US); in service since 2000; blocks 584/786 (74.3%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 41.1%; complaints 337 (rank 286/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/641
- 645; Florida (US); in service since 2023; blocks 79/786 (10.1%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 35.4%; complaints 202 (rank 341/422); overlays with 305/786; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/645
- 646; New York (US); in service since 1999; blocks 781/786 (99.4%); top holder Verizon 28.6%; complaints 520 (rank 204/422); overlays with 212/332/917; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/646
- 647; Ontario (CA); in service since 2001; blocks 778/800 (97.2%); complaints 340 (rank 285/422); overlays with 416/437; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/647
- 650; California (US); in service since 1997; blocks 717/786 (91.2%); top holder AT&T 50.8%; complaints 663 (rank 152/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/650
- 651; Minnesota (US); in service since 1998; blocks 474/786 (60.3%); top holder Lumen 44.9%; complaints 377 (rank 258/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/651
- 656; Florida (US); in service since 2022; blocks 98/786 (12.5%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 31.6%; complaints 347 (rank 278/422); overlays with 813; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/656
- 657; California (US); in service since 2008; blocks 703/786 (89.4%); top holder Verizon 53.3%; complaints 472 (rank 219/422); overlays with 714; overlay being planned; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/657
- 659; Alabama (US); in service since 2019; blocks 179/786 (22.8%); top holder Onvoy 38.5%; complaints 256 (rank 320/422); overlays with 205; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/659
- 660; Missouri (US); in service since 1997; blocks 518/786 (65.9%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 32.2%; complaints 295 (rank 305/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/660
- 661; California (US); in service since 1999; blocks 674/786 (85.8%); top holder AT&T 35.9%; complaints 648 (rank 160/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/661
- 662; Mississippi (US); in service since 1999; blocks 756/786 (96.2%); top holder AT&T 36.5%; complaints 415 (rank 243/422); overlays with 471; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/662
- 667; Maryland (US); in service since 2012; blocks 454/786 (57.8%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 27.3%; complaints 332 (rank 287/422); overlays with 410/443; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/667
- 669; California (US); in service since 2012; blocks 238/786 (30.3%); top holder T-Mobile 20.6%; complaints 255 (rank 321/422); overlays with 408; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/669
- 670; Northern Mariana Islands (US); in service since 1997; blocks 35/786 (4.5%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 100%; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/670
- 671; Guam (US); in service since 1997; blocks 95/786 (12.1%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 100%; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/671
- 672; British Columbia (CA); in service since 2013; blocks 324/800 (40.5%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 19.8%; complaints 34 (rank 392/422); overlays with 236/250/257/604/778; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/672
- 678; Georgia (US); in service since 1998; blocks 785/786 (99.9%); top holder AT&T 25.4%; complaints 864 (rank 73/422); overlays with 404/470/770/943; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/678
- 679; Michigan (US); in service since 2025; blocks 0/786 (0%); overlays with 313; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/679
- 680; New York (US); in service since 2017; blocks 210/786 (26.7%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 43.8%; complaints 343 (rank 283/422); overlays with 315; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/680
- 681; West Virginia (US); in service since 2009; blocks 499/786 (63.5%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 28.3%; complaints 364 (rank 268/422); overlays with 304; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/681
- 682; Texas (US); in service since 2000; blocks 423/786 (53.8%); top holder AT&T 24.8%; complaints 399 (rank 253/422); overlays with 817; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/682
- 683; Ontario (CA); in service since 2022; blocks 81/800 (10.1%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 54.3%; overlays with 249/705; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/683
- 684; American Samoa (US); in service since 2004; blocks 21/786 (2.7%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 100%; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/684
- 686; Virginia (US); in service since 2024; blocks 31/786 (3.9%); top holder Onvoy 41.9%; complaints 16 (rank 400/422); overlays with 804; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/686
- 689; Florida (US); in service since 2019; blocks 236/786 (30%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 25.4%; complaints 425 (rank 235/422); overlays with 321/407; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/689
- 701; North Dakota (US); in service since 1947; blocks 743/786 (94.5%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 49.3%; complaints 298 (rank 303/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/701
- 702; Nevada (US); in service since 1947; blocks 786/786 (100%); top holder Lumen 32.8%; complaints 1089 (rank 30/422); overlays with 725; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/702
- 703; Virginia (US); in service since 1947; blocks 775/786 (98.6%); top holder Verizon 69%; complaints 671 (rank 147/422); overlays with 571; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/703
- 704; North Carolina (US); in service since 1947; blocks 782/786 (99.5%); top holder AT&T 39.9%; complaints 880 (rank 69/422); overlays with 980; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/704
- 705; Ontario (CA); in service since 1957; blocks 770/800 (96.2%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 17.3%; complaints 376 (rank 259/422); overlays with 249/683; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/705
- 706; Georgia (US); in service since 1992; blocks 777/786 (98.9%); top holder AT&T 34.4%; complaints 731 (rank 123/422); overlays with 762; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/706
- 707; California (US); in service since 1959; blocks 785/786 (99.9%); top holder AT&T 40.4%; complaints 1431 (rank 7/422); overlays with 369; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/707
- 708; Illinois (US); in service since 1989; blocks 784/786 (99.7%); top holder AT&T 41.1%; complaints 963 (rank 45/422); overlays with 464; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/708
- 709; Newfoundland and Labrador (CA); in service since 1962; blocks 631/800 (78.9%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 45.5%; complaints 519 (rank 205/422); overlays with 879; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/709
- 712; Iowa (US); in service since 1947; blocks 633/786 (80.5%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 39.8%; complaints 424 (rank 236/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/712
- 713; Texas (US); in service since 1947; blocks 785/786 (99.9%); top holder AT&T 68.9%; complaints 881 (rank 67/422); overlays with 281/346/621/832; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/713
- 714; California (US); in service since 1951; blocks 785/786 (99.9%); top holder AT&T 46%; complaints 608 (rank 169/422); overlays with 657; overlay being planned; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/714
- 715; Wisconsin (US); in service since 1947; blocks 785/786 (99.9%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 21.4%; complaints 604 (rank 170/422); overlays with 534; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/715
- 716; New York (US); in service since 1947; blocks 768/786 (97.7%); top holder Verizon 38.7%; complaints 419 (rank 241/422); overlays with 624; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/716
- 717; Pennsylvania (US); in service since 1947; blocks 784/786 (99.7%); top holder Verizon 34.6%; complaints 772 (rank 114/422); overlays with 223; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/717
- 718; New York (US); in service since 1984; blocks 779/786 (99.1%); top holder Verizon 76.9%; complaints 265 (rank 317/422); overlays with 347/465/917/929; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/718
- 719; Colorado (US); in service since 1988; blocks 665/786 (84.6%); top holder Lumen 36.1%; complaints 958 (rank 46/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/719
- 720; Colorado (US); in service since 1998; blocks 785/786 (99.9%); top holder Lumen 21.7%; complaints 1150 (rank 24/422); overlays with 303/983; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/720
- 724; Pennsylvania (US); in service since 1998; blocks 783/786 (99.6%); top holder Verizon 33%; complaints 808 (rank 96/422); overlays with 878; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/724
- 725; Nevada (US); in service since 2014; blocks 215/786 (27.4%); top holder Onvoy 21.4%; complaints 699 (rank 129/422); overlays with 702; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/725
- 726; Texas (US); in service since 2017; blocks 114/786 (14.5%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 33.3%; complaints 97 (rank 379/422); overlays with 210; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/726
- 727; Florida (US); in service since 1998; blocks 627/786 (79.8%); top holder Frontier 33%; complaints 854 (rank 77/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/727
- 728; Florida (US); in service since 2023; blocks 69/786 (8.8%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 26.1%; complaints 59 (rank 383/422); overlays with 561; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/728
- 729; Tennessee (US); in service since 2025; blocks 0/786 (0%); overlays with 423; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/729
- 730; Illinois (US); in service since 2023; blocks 130/786 (16.5%); top holder AT&T 45.4%; complaints 37 (rank 391/422); overlays with 618; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/730
- 731; Tennessee (US); in service since 2001; blocks 395/786 (50.3%); top holder AT&T 35.9%; complaints 422 (rank 238/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/731
- 732; New Jersey (US); in service since 1997; blocks 780/786 (99.2%); top holder Verizon 56.8%; complaints 1131 (rank 26/422); overlays with 848; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/732
- 734; Michigan (US); in service since 1997; blocks 701/786 (89.2%); top holder AT&T 34.4%; complaints 664 (rank 151/422); overlays with 679; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/734
- 737; Texas (US); in service since 2013; blocks 333/786 (42.4%); top holder Onvoy 24.6%; complaints 568 (rank 186/422); overlays with 512; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/737
- 738; California (US); in service since 2024; blocks 30/786 (3.8%); top holder Onvoy 63.3%; complaints 30 (rank 396/422); overlays with 213/323; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/738
- 740; Ohio (US); in service since 1997; blocks 786/786 (100%); top holder AT&T 22.3%; complaints 574 (rank 180/422); overlays with 220; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/740
- 742; Ontario (CA); in service since 2021; blocks 149/800 (18.6%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 51%; complaints 6 (rank 413/422); overlays with 289/365/905; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/742
- 743; North Carolina (US); in service since 2016; blocks 163/786 (20.7%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 32.5%; complaints 288 (rank 311/422); overlays with 336; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/743
- 747; California (US); in service since 2009; blocks 260/786 (33.1%); top holder T-Mobile 23.5%; complaints 379 (rank 257/422); overlays with 818; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/747
- 748; Colorado (US); in service since 2025; blocks 9/786 (1.1%); top holder Onvoy 55.6%; overlays with 970; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/748
- 753; Ontario (CA); in service since 2022; blocks 111/800 (13.9%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 37.8%; complaints 10 (rank 403/422); overlays with 343/613; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/753
- 754; Florida (US); in service since 2001; blocks 219/786 (27.9%); top holder T-Mobile 32.9%; complaints 346 (rank 280/422); overlays with 954; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/754
- 757; Virginia (US); in service since 1996; blocks 785/786 (99.9%); top holder Verizon 47.1%; complaints 1265 (rank 14/422); overlays with 948; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/757
- 760; California (US); in service since 1997; blocks 785/786 (99.9%); top holder AT&T 28.5%; complaints 1010 (rank 39/422); overlays with 442; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/760
- 761; Kentucky (US); planned, starts date not set; blocks 0/786 (0%); overlays with 502; overlay being planned; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/761
- 762; Georgia (US); in service since 2006; blocks 379/786 (48.2%); top holder Onvoy 21.6%; complaints 406 (rank 246/422); overlays with 706; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/762
- 763; Minnesota (US); in service since 2000; blocks 368/786 (46.8%); top holder Lumen 43.8%; complaints 217 (rank 333/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/763
- 765; Indiana (US); in service since 1997; blocks 725/786 (92.2%); top holder AT&T 34.1%; complaints 551 (rank 193/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/765
- 769; Mississippi (US); in service since 2005; blocks 255/786 (32.4%); top holder AT&T 32.2%; complaints 147 (rank 359/422); overlays with 601; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/769
- 770; Georgia (US); in service since 1995; blocks 785/786 (99.9%); top holder AT&T 66.9%; complaints 766 (rank 116/422); overlays with 470/678/943; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/770
- 771; District of Columbia (US); in service since 2021; blocks 72/786 (9.2%); top holder AT&T 20.8%; complaints 442 (rank 230/422); overlays with 202; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/771
- 772; Florida (US); in service since 2002; blocks 313/786 (39.8%); top holder AT&T 33.9%; complaints 833 (rank 89/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/772
- 773; Illinois (US); in service since 1996; blocks 786/786 (100%); top holder AT&T 46.3%; complaints 667 (rank 150/422); overlays with 872; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/773
- 774; Massachusetts (US); in service since 2001; blocks 522/786 (66.4%); top holder Verizon 27.8%; complaints 907 (rank 59/422); overlays with 508; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/774
- 775; Nevada (US); in service since 1998; blocks 601/786 (76.5%); top holder AT&T 30.4%; complaints 1275 (rank 13/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/775
- 778; British Columbia (CA); in service since 2001; blocks 779/800 (97.4%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 17.6%; complaints 401 (rank 251/422); overlays with 236/250/257/604/672; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/778
- 779; Illinois (US); in service since 2007; blocks 354/786 (45%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 33.3%; complaints 194 (rank 345/422); overlays with 815; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/779
- 780; Alberta (CA); in service since 1999; blocks 780/800 (97.5%); complaints 356 (rank 276/422); overlays with 368/403/568/587/825; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/780
- 781; Massachusetts (US); in service since 1997; blocks 769/786 (97.8%); top holder Verizon 46.7%; complaints 371 (rank 264/422); overlays with 339; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/781
- 782; Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island (CA); in service since 2014; blocks 465/800 (58.1%); complaints 121 (rank 370/422); overlays with 851/902; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/782
- 785; Kansas (US); in service since 1997; blocks 726/786 (92.4%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 36.5%; complaints 886 (rank 64/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/785
- 786; Florida (US); in service since 1998; blocks 786/786 (100%); top holder T-Mobile 35.8%; complaints 834 (rank 87/422); overlays with 305/645; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/786
- 787; Puerto Rico (US); in service since 1996; blocks 777/786 (98.9%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 53.2%; complaints 31 (rank 395/422); overlays with 939; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/787
- 801; Utah (US); in service since 1947; blocks 783/786 (99.6%); top holder Lumen 43.4%; complaints 571 (rank 183/422); overlays with 385; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/801
- 802; Vermont (US); in service since 1947; blocks 571/786 (72.6%); top holder Consolidated 28.2%; complaints 258 (rank 319/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/802
- 803; South Carolina (US); in service since 1947; blocks 784/786 (99.7%); top holder AT&T 34.1%; complaints 669 (rank 148/422); overlays with 839; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/803
- 804; Virginia (US); in service since 1973; blocks 781/786 (99.4%); top holder Verizon 43.5%; complaints 1973 (rank 2/422); overlays with 686; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/804
- 805; California (US); in service since 1957; blocks 786/786 (100%); top holder AT&T 29.1%; complaints 881 (rank 68/422); overlays with 820; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/805
- 806; Texas (US); in service since 1957; blocks 734/786 (93.4%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 29.6%; complaints 821 (rank 93/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/806
- 807; Ontario (CA); in service since 1962; blocks 297/800 (37.1%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 12.8%; complaints 111 (rank 375/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/807
- 808; Hawaii (US); in service since 1957; blocks 694/786 (88.3%); top holder Hawaiian Telcom 45.4%; complaints 219 (rank 332/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/808
- 810; Michigan (US); in service since 1993; blocks 509/786 (64.8%); top holder AT&T 36.7%; complaints 706 (rank 128/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/810
- 812; Indiana (US); in service since 1947; blocks 785/786 (99.9%); top holder AT&T 30.4%; complaints 463 (rank 222/422); overlays with 930; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/812
- 813; Florida (US); in service since 1953; blocks 782/786 (99.5%); top holder Frontier 29.8%; complaints 1926 (rank 3/422); overlays with 656; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/813
- 814; Pennsylvania (US); in service since 1947; blocks 784/786 (99.7%); top holder Verizon 35.8%; complaints 584 (rank 177/422); overlays with 582; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/814
- 815; Illinois (US); in service since 1947; blocks 786/786 (100%); top holder AT&T 28.9%; complaints 915 (rank 58/422); overlays with 779; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/815
- 816; Missouri (US); in service since 1947; blocks 785/786 (99.9%); top holder AT&T 40.3%; complaints 783 (rank 106/422); overlays with 975; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/816
- 817; Texas (US); in service since 1953; blocks 781/786 (99.4%); top holder AT&T 53.5%; complaints 1248 (rank 18/422); overlays with 682; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/817
- 818; California (US); in service since 1984; blocks 781/786 (99.4%); top holder AT&T 47.4%; complaints 778 (rank 110/422); overlays with 747; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/818
- 819; Quebec (CA); in service since 1957; blocks 770/800 (96.2%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 30.1%; complaints 312 (rank 293/422); overlays with 468/873; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/819
- 820; California (US); in service since 2018; blocks 98/786 (12.5%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 46.9%; complaints 135 (rank 368/422); overlays with 805; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/820
- 821; South Carolina (US); in service since 2024; blocks 42/786 (5.3%); top holder AT&T 57.1%; complaints 8 (rank 407/422); overlays with 864; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/821
- 825; Alberta (CA); in service since 2016; blocks 771/800 (96.4%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 8.7%; complaints 207 (rank 338/422); overlays with 368/403/568/587/780; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/825
- 826; Virginia (US); in service since 2022; blocks 125/786 (15.9%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 48.8%; complaints 142 (rank 362/422); overlays with 540; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/826
- 828; North Carolina (US); in service since 1998; blocks 724/786 (92.1%); top holder AT&T 29.4%; complaints 570 (rank 185/422); overlay being planned; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/828
- 830; Texas (US); in service since 1997; blocks 496/786 (63.1%); top holder AT&T 29%; complaints 699 (rank 130/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/830
- 831; California (US); in service since 1998; blocks 406/786 (51.7%); top holder AT&T 42.9%; complaints 458 (rank 225/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/831
- 832; Texas (US); in service since 1999; blocks 786/786 (100%); top holder AT&T 32.6%; complaints 1092 (rank 29/422); overlays with 281/346/713; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/832
- 835; Pennsylvania (US); in service since 2022; blocks 111/786 (14.1%); top holder AT&T 45.9%; complaints 80 (rank 381/422); overlays with 484/610; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/835
- 837; California (US); in service since 2025; blocks 11/786 (1.4%); top holder Onvoy 54.5%; overlays with 530; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/837
- 838; New York (US); in service since 2017; blocks 227/786 (28.9%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 46.7%; complaints 500 (rank 210/422); overlays with 518; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/838
- 839; South Carolina (US); in service since 2020; blocks 192/786 (24.4%); top holder AT&T 34.4%; complaints 226 (rank 328/422); overlays with 803; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/839
- 840; California (US); in service since 2021; blocks 130/786 (16.5%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 25.4%; complaints 137 (rank 366/422); overlays with 909; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/840
- 843; South Carolina (US); in service since 1998; blocks 783/786 (99.6%); top holder AT&T 26.6%; complaints 571 (rank 184/422); overlays with 854; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/843
- 845; New York (US); in service since 2000; blocks 783/786 (99.6%); top holder Verizon 31.7%; complaints 718 (rank 125/422); overlays with 329; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/845
- 847; Illinois (US); in service since 1996; blocks 786/786 (100%); top holder AT&T 63.4%; complaints 550 (rank 194/422); overlays with 224; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/847
- 848; New Jersey (US); in service since 2001; blocks 291/786 (37%); top holder Onvoy 26.8%; complaints 282 (rank 312/422); overlays with 732; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/848
- 850; Florida (US); in service since 1997; blocks 786/786 (100%); top holder Lumen 23.3%; complaints 878 (rank 72/422); overlays with 448; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/850
- 851; Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island (CA); planned, starts 2028-05-27; blocks 0/786 (0%); overlays with 782/902; overlay being planned; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/851
- 854; South Carolina (US); in service since 2015; blocks 182/786 (23.2%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 34.1%; complaints 117 (rank 372/422); overlays with 843; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/854
- 856; New Jersey (US); in service since 1999; blocks 676/786 (86%); top holder Verizon 37.3%; complaints 1042 (rank 34/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/856
- 857; Massachusetts (US); in service since 2001; blocks 361/786 (45.9%); top holder Verizon 25.8%; complaints 827 (rank 91/422); overlays with 617; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/857
- 858; California (US); in service since 1999; blocks 564/786 (71.8%); top holder AT&T 41.7%; complaints 620 (rank 166/422); overlays with 619; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/858
- 859; Kentucky (US); in service since 2000; blocks 563/786 (71.6%); top holder AT&T 20.6%; complaints 603 (rank 171/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/859
- 860; Connecticut (US); in service since 1995; blocks 783/786 (99.6%); top holder AT&T 55.3%; complaints 755 (rank 120/422); overlays with 959; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/860
- 861; Illinois (US); in service since 2023; blocks 8/786 (1%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 75%; overlays with 309; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/861
- 862; New Jersey (US); in service since 2001; blocks 391/786 (49.7%); top holder T-Mobile 24.3%; complaints 418 (rank 242/422); overlays with 973; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/862
- 863; Florida (US); in service since 1999; blocks 472/786 (60.1%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 18.2%; complaints 796 (rank 102/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/863
- 864; South Carolina (US); in service since 1995; blocks 784/786 (99.7%); top holder AT&T 32.5%; complaints 575 (rank 179/422); overlays with 821; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/864
- 865; Tennessee (US); in service since 1999; blocks 506/786 (64.4%); top holder AT&T 40.3%; complaints 797 (rank 101/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/865
- 867; Northwest Territories, Yukon and Nunavut (CA); in service since 1997; blocks 260/800 (32.5%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 13.1%; complaints 113 (rank 374/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/867
- 870; Arkansas (US); in service since 1997; blocks 785/786 (99.9%); top holder AT&T 35%; complaints 907 (rank 60/422); overlays with 327; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/870
- 872; Illinois (US); in service since 2009; blocks 281/786 (35.8%); top holder T-Mobile 26%; complaints 506 (rank 209/422); overlays with 312/773; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/872
- 873; Quebec (CA); in service since 2012; blocks 673/800 (84.1%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 18.7%; complaints 183 (rank 353/422); overlays with 468/819; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/873
- 878; Pennsylvania (US); in service since 2001; blocks 191/786 (24.3%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 27.2%; complaints 185 (rank 351/422); overlays with 412/724; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/878
- 901; Tennessee (US); in service since 1947; blocks 616/786 (78.4%); top holder AT&T 45.6%; complaints 919 (rank 57/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/901
- 902; Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island (CA); in service since 1947; blocks 782/800 (97.8%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 46.2%; complaints 362 (rank 270/422); overlays with 782/851; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/902
- 903; Texas (US); in service since 1990; blocks 771/786 (98.1%); top holder AT&T 26.2%; complaints 1140 (rank 25/422); overlays with 430; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/903
- 904; Florida (US); in service since 1965; blocks 785/786 (99.9%); top holder AT&T 40.9%; complaints 1231 (rank 19/422); overlays with 324; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/904
- 905; Ontario (CA); in service since 1993; blocks 773/800 (96.6%); complaints 363 (rank 269/422); overlays with 289/365/742; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/905
- 906; Michigan (US); in service since 1961; blocks 360/786 (45.8%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 45.3%; complaints 128 (rank 369/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/906
- 907; Alaska (US); in service since 1957; blocks 657/786 (83.6%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 58%; complaints 194 (rank 346/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/907
- 908; New Jersey (US); in service since 1990; blocks 721/786 (91.7%); top holder Verizon 37.6%; complaints 782 (rank 108/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/908
- 909; California (US); in service since 1992; blocks 786/786 (100%); top holder Frontier 19.8%; complaints 845 (rank 83/422); overlays with 840; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/909
- 910; North Carolina (US); in service since 1993; blocks 785/786 (99.9%); top holder AT&T 17.8%; complaints 762 (rank 117/422); overlays with 472; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/910
- 912; Georgia (US); in service since 1954; blocks 731/786 (93%); top holder AT&T 35.3%; complaints 428 (rank 232/422); overlays with 565; overlay being planned; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/912
- 913; Kansas (US); in service since 1947; blocks 533/786 (67.8%); top holder AT&T 39.6%; complaints 572 (rank 181/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/913
- 914; New York (US); in service since 1947; blocks 704/786 (89.6%); top holder Verizon 45.9%; complaints 652 (rank 158/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/914
- 915; Texas (US); in service since 1947; blocks 367/786 (46.7%); top holder AT&T 39.5%; complaints 347 (rank 279/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/915
- 916; California (US); in service since 1947; blocks 785/786 (99.9%); top holder AT&T 43.6%; complaints 787 (rank 105/422); overlays with 279; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/916
- 917; New York (US); in service since 1992; blocks 784/786 (99.7%); top holder Verizon 26.4%; complaints 515 (rank 206/422); overlays with 212/332/347/465/646/718/929; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/917
- 918; Oklahoma (US); in service since 1953; blocks 782/786 (99.5%); top holder AT&T 42.7%; complaints 748 (rank 122/422); overlays with 539; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/918
- 919; North Carolina (US); in service since 1954; blocks 781/786 (99.4%); top holder AT&T 28.8%; complaints 662 (rank 154/422); overlays with 984; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/919
- 920; Wisconsin (US); in service since 1997; blocks 785/786 (99.9%); top holder AT&T 26.8%; complaints 676 (rank 144/422); overlays with 274; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/920
- 924; Minnesota (US); in service since 2024; blocks 0/786 (0%); overlays with 507; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/924
- 925; California (US); in service since 1998; blocks 640/786 (81.4%); top holder AT&T 43.8%; complaints 948 (rank 48/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/925
- 928; Arizona (US); in service since 2001; blocks 637/786 (81%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 22.3%; complaints 1401 (rank 8/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/928
- 929; New York (US); in service since 2011; blocks 709/786 (90.2%); top holder T-Mobile 38.9%; complaints 779 (rank 109/422); overlays with 347/465/718/917; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/929
- 930; Indiana (US); in service since 2015; blocks 159/786 (20.2%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 44%; complaints 138 (rank 365/422); overlays with 812; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/930
- 931; Tennessee (US); in service since 1997; blocks 538/786 (68.4%); top holder AT&T 25.7%; complaints 654 (rank 157/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/931
- 934; New York (US); in service since 2016; blocks 131/786 (16.7%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 39.7%; complaints 184 (rank 352/422); overlays with 631; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/934
- 936; Texas (US); in service since 2000; blocks 422/786 (53.7%); top holder AT&T 20.6%; complaints 309 (rank 294/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/936
- 937; Ohio (US); in service since 1996; blocks 781/786 (99.4%); top holder AT&T 31.2%; complaints 678 (rank 141/422); overlays with 326; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/937
- 938; Alabama (US); in service since 2010; blocks 194/786 (24.7%); top holder AT&T 39.7%; complaints 141 (rank 363/422); overlays with 256; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/938
- 939; Puerto Rico (US); in service since 2001; blocks 359/786 (45.7%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 38.2%; complaints 16 (rank 401/422); overlays with 787; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/939
- 940; Texas (US); in service since 1997; blocks 506/786 (64.4%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 31.2%; complaints 572 (rank 182/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/940
- 941; Florida (US); in service since 1995; blocks 487/786 (62%); top holder Frontier 20.9%; complaints 1080 (rank 31/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/941
- 942; Ontario (CA); in service since 2025; blocks 57/800 (7.1%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 5.3%; overlays with 416/437/647; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/942
- 943; Georgia (US); in service since 2022; blocks 153/786 (19.5%); top holder Onvoy 26.8%; complaints 402 (rank 249/422); overlays with 404/470/678/770; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/943
- 945; Texas (US); in service since 2021; blocks 300/786 (38.2%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 25.7%; complaints 372 (rank 262/422); overlays with 214/469/972; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/945
- 947; Michigan (US); in service since 2002; blocks 211/786 (26.8%); top holder Verizon 34.6%; complaints 118 (rank 371/422); overlays with 248; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/947
- 948; Virginia (US); in service since 2022; blocks 101/786 (12.8%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 40.6%; complaints 191 (rank 348/422); overlays with 757; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/948
- 949; California (US); in service since 1998; blocks 747/786 (95%); top holder AT&T 37.1%; complaints 1387 (rank 9/422); overlay being planned; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/949
- 951; California (US); in service since 2004; blocks 696/786 (88.5%); top holder AT&T 23.9%; complaints 687 (rank 134/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/951
- 952; Minnesota (US); in service since 2000; blocks 340/786 (43.3%); top holder Lumen 53.8%; complaints 108 (rank 376/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/952
- 954; Florida (US); in service since 1995; blocks 776/786 (98.7%); top holder AT&T 49.2%; complaints 776 (rank 112/422); overlays with 754; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/954
- 956; Texas (US); in service since 1997; blocks 735/786 (93.5%); top holder AT&T 40%; complaints 576 (rank 178/422); overlay being planned; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/956
- 959; Connecticut (US); in service since 2014; blocks 164/786 (20.9%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 30.5%; complaints 248 (rank 323/422); overlays with 860; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/959
- 970; Colorado (US); in service since 1995; blocks 786/786 (100%); top holder Lumen 33.7%; complaints 1101 (rank 28/422); overlays with 748; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/970
- 971; Oregon (US); in service since 2000; blocks 444/786 (56.5%); top holder T-Mobile 16%; complaints 563 (rank 189/422); overlays with 503; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/971
- 972; Texas (US); in service since 1996; blocks 785/786 (99.9%); top holder AT&T 51.5%; complaints 1030 (rank 37/422); overlays with 214/469/945; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/972
- 973; New Jersey (US); in service since 1997; blocks 779/786 (99.1%); top holder Verizon 57%; complaints 726 (rank 124/422); overlays with 862; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/973
- 975; Missouri (US); in service since 2023; blocks 30/786 (3.8%); top holder Onvoy 53.3%; complaints 8 (rank 408/422); overlays with 816; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/975
- 978; Massachusetts (US); in service since 1997; blocks 773/786 (98.3%); top holder Verizon 44.5%; complaints 460 (rank 223/422); overlays with 351; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/978
- 979; Texas (US); in service since 2000; blocks 413/786 (52.5%); top holder AT&T 26.9%; complaints 276 (rank 314/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/979
- 980; North Carolina (US); in service since 2001; blocks 464/786 (59%); top holder Onvoy 18.5%; complaints 658 (rank 156/422); overlays with 704; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/980
- 983; Colorado (US); in service since 2022; blocks 48/786 (6.1%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 39.6%; complaints 145 (rank 360/422); overlays with 303/720; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/983
- 984; North Carolina (US); in service since 2012; blocks 296/786 (37.7%); top holder Onvoy 20.3%; complaints 459 (rank 224/422); overlays with 919; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/984
- 985; Louisiana (US); in service since 2001; blocks 447/786 (56.9%); top holder AT&T 41.4%; complaints 783 (rank 107/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/985
- 986; Idaho (US); in service since 2017; blocks 189/786 (24%); top holder Other CLEC / VoIP 49.2%; complaints 291 (rank 309/422); overlays with 208; https://numberingdata.com/area-code/986
- 989; Michigan (US); in service since 2001; blocks 723/786 (92%); top holder AT&T 24.6%; complaints 530 (rank 201/422); https://numberingdata.com/area-code/989

## States and provinces (66)

- Alabama (US): 7 codes – 205, 251, 256, 334, 483, 659, 938; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/alabama
- Alaska (US): 1 codes – 907; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/alaska
- Alberta (CA): 5 codes – 403, 568, 587, 780, 825; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/alberta
- American Samoa (US): 1 codes – 684; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/american-samoa
- Arizona (US): 5 codes – 480, 520, 602, 623, 928; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/arizona
- Arkansas (US): 4 codes – 327, 479, 501, 870; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/arkansas
- British Columbia (CA): 6 codes – 236, 250, 257, 604, 672, 778; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/british-columbia
- California (US): 41 codes – 209, 213, 279, 310, 323, 341, 350, 357, 369, 408, 415, 424, 442, 510, 530, 559, 562, 619, 626, 628, 650, 657, 661, 669, 707, 714, 738, 747, 760, 805, 818, 820, 831, 837, 840, 858, 909, 916, 925, 949, 951; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/california
- Colorado (US): 6 codes – 303, 719, 720, 748, 970, 983; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/colorado
- Connecticut (US): 4 codes – 203, 475, 860, 959; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/connecticut
- Delaware (US): 1 codes – 302; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/delaware
- District of Columbia (US): 2 codes – 202, 771; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/district-of-columbia
- Florida (US): 23 codes – 239, 305, 321, 324, 352, 386, 407, 448, 561, 645, 656, 689, 727, 728, 754, 772, 786, 813, 850, 863, 904, 941, 954; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/florida
- Georgia (US): 11 codes – 229, 404, 470, 478, 565, 678, 706, 762, 770, 912, 943; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/georgia
- Guam (US): 1 codes – 671; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/guam
- Hawaii (US): 1 codes – 808; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/hawaii
- Idaho (US): 2 codes – 208, 986; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/idaho
- Illinois (US): 17 codes – 217, 224, 309, 312, 331, 447, 464, 618, 630, 708, 730, 773, 779, 815, 847, 861, 872; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/illinois
- Indiana (US): 8 codes – 219, 260, 317, 463, 574, 765, 812, 930; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/indiana
- Iowa (US): 5 codes – 319, 515, 563, 641, 712; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/iowa
- Kansas (US): 4 codes – 316, 620, 785, 913; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/kansas
- Kentucky (US): 6 codes – 270, 364, 502, 606, 761, 859; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/kentucky
- Louisiana (US): 6 codes – 225, 318, 337, 457, 504, 985; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/louisiana
- Maine (US): 1 codes – 207; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/maine
- Manitoba (CA): 3 codes – 204, 431, 584; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/manitoba
- Maryland (US): 6 codes – 227, 240, 301, 410, 443, 667; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/maryland
- Massachusetts (US): 9 codes – 339, 351, 413, 508, 617, 774, 781, 857, 978; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/massachusetts
- Michigan (US): 13 codes – 231, 248, 269, 313, 517, 586, 616, 679, 734, 810, 906, 947, 989; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/michigan
- Minnesota (US): 8 codes – 218, 320, 507, 612, 651, 763, 924, 952; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/minnesota
- Mississippi (US): 5 codes – 228, 471, 601, 662, 769; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/mississippi
- Missouri (US): 9 codes – 235, 314, 417, 557, 573, 636, 660, 816, 975; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/missouri
- Montana (US): 1 codes – 406; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/montana
- Nebraska (US): 3 codes – 308, 402, 531; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/nebraska
- Nevada (US): 3 codes – 702, 725, 775; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/nevada
- New Brunswick (CA): 2 codes – 428, 506; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/new-brunswick
- New Hampshire (US): 1 codes – 603; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/new-hampshire
- New Jersey (US): 10 codes – 201, 551, 609, 640, 732, 848, 856, 862, 908, 973; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/new-jersey
- New Mexico (US): 2 codes – 505, 575; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/new-mexico
- New York (US): 23 codes – 212, 315, 329, 332, 347, 363, 465, 516, 518, 585, 607, 624, 631, 646, 680, 716, 718, 838, 845, 914, 917, 929, 934; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/new-york
- Newfoundland and Labrador (CA): 1 codes – 709; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/newfoundland-and-labrador
- North Carolina (US): 11 codes – 252, 336, 451, 472, 704, 743, 828, 910, 919, 980, 984; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/north-carolina
- North Dakota (US): 1 codes – 701; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/north-dakota
- Northern Mariana Islands (US): 1 codes – 670; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/northern-mariana-islands
- Northwest Territories, Yukon and Nunavut (CA): 1 codes – 867; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/northwest-territories-yukon-and-nunavut
- Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island (CA): 3 codes – 782, 851, 902; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/nova-scotia-and-prince-edward-island
- Ohio (US): 15 codes – 216, 220, 234, 283, 326, 330, 380, 419, 436, 440, 513, 567, 614, 740, 937; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/ohio
- Oklahoma (US): 5 codes – 405, 539, 572, 580, 918; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/oklahoma
- Ontario (CA): 19 codes – 226, 249, 289, 343, 365, 382, 416, 437, 519, 548, 613, 647, 683, 705, 742, 753, 807, 905, 942; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/ontario
- Oregon (US): 4 codes – 458, 503, 541, 971; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/oregon
- Pennsylvania (US): 15 codes – 215, 223, 267, 272, 412, 445, 484, 570, 582, 610, 717, 724, 814, 835, 878; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/pennsylvania
- Puerto Rico (US): 2 codes – 787, 939; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/puerto-rico
- Quebec (CA): 13 codes – 263, 273, 354, 367, 418, 438, 450, 468, 514, 579, 581, 819, 873; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/quebec
- Rhode Island (US): 1 codes – 401; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/rhode-island
- Saskatchewan (CA): 3 codes – 306, 474, 639; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/saskatchewan
- South Carolina (US): 6 codes – 803, 821, 839, 843, 854, 864; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/south-carolina
- South Dakota (US): 1 codes – 605; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/south-dakota
- Tennessee (US): 8 codes – 423, 615, 629, 729, 731, 865, 901, 931; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/tennessee
- Texas (US): 29 codes – 210, 214, 254, 281, 325, 346, 361, 409, 430, 432, 469, 512, 621, 682, 713, 726, 737, 806, 817, 830, 832, 903, 915, 936, 940, 945, 956, 972, 979; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/texas
- U.S. Virgin Islands (US): 1 codes – 340; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/u-s-virgin-islands
- Utah (US): 3 codes – 385, 435, 801; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/utah
- Vermont (US): 1 codes – 802; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/vermont
- Virginia (US): 10 codes – 276, 434, 540, 571, 686, 703, 757, 804, 826, 948; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/virginia
- Washington (US): 6 codes – 206, 253, 360, 425, 509, 564; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/washington
- West Virginia (US): 2 codes – 304, 681; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/west-virginia
- Wisconsin (US): 8 codes – 262, 274, 353, 414, 534, 608, 715, 920; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/wisconsin
- Wyoming (US): 1 codes – 307; https://numberingdata.com/area-codes/wyoming

## Canadian cities and exchange areas (306)

- Airdrie, Alberta: codes 587/403/825; 23 blocks; top holder Telus 30%; https://numberingdata.com/city/airdrie-ab
- Banff, Alberta: codes 587/403/825/368; 31 blocks; top holder Telus Mobility 23%; https://numberingdata.com/city/banff-ab
- Bonnyville, Alberta: codes 780/587/825; 17 blocks; top holder Telus 29%; https://numberingdata.com/city/bonnyville-ab
- Brooks, Alberta: codes 403/587/825/368; 20 blocks; top holder Telus 35%; https://numberingdata.com/city/brooks-ab
- Calgary, Alberta: codes 403/587/825/368; 768 blocks; top holder Telus 29%; https://numberingdata.com/city/calgary-ab
- Camrose, Alberta: codes 780/587/825/368; 22 blocks; top holder Telus 32%; https://numberingdata.com/city/camrose-ab
- Canmore, Alberta: codes 403/587/825/368; 26 blocks; top holder Other 19%; https://numberingdata.com/city/canmore-ab
- Cochrane, Alberta: codes 403/587/825; 15 blocks; top holder Telus 27%; https://numberingdata.com/city/cochrane-ab
- Drayton Valley, Alberta: codes 780/825/587; 18 blocks; top holder Telus 28%; https://numberingdata.com/city/drayton-valley-ab
- Drumheller, Alberta: codes 403/825/587; 16 blocks; top holder Telus 25%; https://numberingdata.com/city/drumheller-ab
- Edmonton, Alberta: codes 780/587/825/368; 514 blocks; top holder Telus 27%; https://numberingdata.com/city/edmonton-ab
- Edson, Alberta: codes 780/587/825/368; 19 blocks; top holder Telus 32%; https://numberingdata.com/city/edson-ab
- Fort McMurray, Alberta: codes 780/587/825/368; 63 blocks; top holder Telus 37%; https://numberingdata.com/city/fort-mcmurray-ab
- Fox Creek, Alberta: codes 825/780/587; 21 blocks; top holder VoIP providers 52%; https://numberingdata.com/city/fox-creek-ab
- Grande Prairie, Alberta: codes 780/587/825/368; 50 blocks; top holder Telus 36%; https://numberingdata.com/city/grande-prairie-ab
- High Level, Alberta: codes 780/587/825/368; 17 blocks; top holder Rogers 35%; https://numberingdata.com/city/high-level-ab
- High River, Alberta: codes 403/825/587; 28 blocks; top holder VoIP providers 21%; https://numberingdata.com/city/high-river-ab
- Hinton, Alberta: codes 368/780/587/825; 17 blocks; top holder VoIP providers 41%; https://numberingdata.com/city/hinton-ab
- Leduc, Alberta: codes 587/780/825/368; 22 blocks; top holder Telus 27%; https://numberingdata.com/city/leduc-ab
- Lethbridge, Alberta: codes 403/587/825/368; 59 blocks; top holder Telus 31%; https://numberingdata.com/city/lethbridge-ab
- Lloydminster, Alberta: codes 780/587/825/368; 22 blocks; top holder Telus 36%; https://numberingdata.com/city/lloydminster-ab
- Medicine Hat, Alberta: codes 403/587/825/368; 45 blocks; top holder Telus 31%; https://numberingdata.com/city/medicine-hat-ab
- Okotoks, Alberta: codes 403/587/825; 15 blocks; top holder Telus 27%; https://numberingdata.com/city/okotoks-ab
- Olds, Alberta: codes 403/825/587; 16 blocks; top holder Telus 19%; https://numberingdata.com/city/olds-ab
- Peace River, Alberta: codes 780/825/587/368; 25 blocks; top holder VoIP providers 40%; https://numberingdata.com/city/peace-river-ab
- Red Deer, Alberta: codes 403/587/825/368; 72 blocks; top holder Telus 31%; https://numberingdata.com/city/red-deer-ab
- Rocky Mountain House, Alberta: codes 403/825/587; 16 blocks; top holder Telus 25%; https://numberingdata.com/city/rocky-mountain-house-ab
- Sherwood Park, Alberta: codes 780/587/825/368; 26 blocks; top holder Telus 38%; https://numberingdata.com/city/sherwood-park-ab
- Slave Lake, Alberta: codes 587/780/825; 15 blocks; top holder Telus 33%; https://numberingdata.com/city/slave-lake-ab
- St. Albert, Alberta: codes 780/587/825; 23 blocks; top holder Telus 48%; https://numberingdata.com/city/st-albert-ab
- Stettler, Alberta: codes 403/587/825; 15 blocks; top holder Telus 27%; https://numberingdata.com/city/stettler-ab
- Stony Plain, Alberta: codes 587/780/825/368; 15 blocks; top holder Telus 27%; https://numberingdata.com/city/stony-plain-ab
- Strathmore, Alberta: codes 403/587/825; 22 blocks; top holder Telus 23%; https://numberingdata.com/city/strathmore-ab
- Vegreville, Alberta: codes 587/780/825; 16 blocks; top holder Telus 25%; https://numberingdata.com/city/vegreville-ab
- Wetaskiwin, Alberta: codes 780/587/825; 16 blocks; top holder Telus 31%; https://numberingdata.com/city/wetaskiwin-ab
- 100 Mile House, British Columbia: codes 250/236/672/778; 19 blocks; top holder Telus Mobility 47%; https://numberingdata.com/city/100-mile-house-bc
- Abbotsford, British Columbia: codes 604/672/778/236/257; 88 blocks; top holder Telus 23%; https://numberingdata.com/city/abbotsford-bc
- Aldergrove, British Columbia: codes 604/778/236/672; 55 blocks; top holder Rogers 24%; https://numberingdata.com/city/aldergrove-bc
- Campbell River, British Columbia: codes 250/236/778; 22 blocks; top holder Telus 27%; https://numberingdata.com/city/campbell-river-bc
- Chilliwack, British Columbia: codes 604/236/778/672; 41 blocks; top holder Telus 22%; https://numberingdata.com/city/chilliwack-bc
- Cloverdale, British Columbia: codes 778/604/236/257/672; 18 blocks; top holder Telus 39%; https://numberingdata.com/city/cloverdale-bc
- Courtenay, British Columbia: codes 250/778/236/672; 24 blocks; top holder Telus 33%; https://numberingdata.com/city/courtenay-bc
- Cranbrook, British Columbia: codes 672/778/236/250; 37 blocks; top holder VoIP providers 27%; https://numberingdata.com/city/cranbrook-bc
- Dawson Creek, British Columbia: codes 250/778/672/236; 19 blocks; top holder VoIP providers 26%; https://numberingdata.com/city/dawson-creek-bc
- Duncan, British Columbia: codes 250/236/778; 26 blocks; top holder Telus 27%; https://numberingdata.com/city/duncan-bc
- Fort Langley, British Columbia: codes 604/778/236/257/672; 16 blocks; top holder Telus 44%; https://numberingdata.com/city/fort-langley-bc
- Fort St. John, British Columbia: codes 250/236/778/672; 27 blocks; top holder Telus 33%; https://numberingdata.com/city/fort-st-john-bc
- Haney, British Columbia: codes 604/236/778/257/672; 17 blocks; top holder Telus 41%; https://numberingdata.com/city/haney-bc
- Hope, British Columbia: codes 604/236/778/672; 18 blocks; top holder VoIP providers 22%; https://numberingdata.com/city/hope-bc
- Kelowna, British Columbia: codes 250/236/778/672; 77 blocks; top holder Telus Mobility 26%; https://numberingdata.com/city/kelowna-bc
- Ladner, British Columbia: codes 604/778/236/672; 18 blocks; top holder Telus 44%; https://numberingdata.com/city/ladner-bc
- Langley, British Columbia: codes 604/778/236/257/672; 23 blocks; top holder Telus 39%; https://numberingdata.com/city/langley-bc
- Nanaimo, British Columbia: codes 250/236/778/672; 48 blocks; top holder Telus 27%; https://numberingdata.com/city/nanaimo-bc
- Nelson, British Columbia: codes 250/778/236/672; 16 blocks; top holder Telus 31%; https://numberingdata.com/city/nelson-bc
- New Westminster, British Columbia: codes 604/778/236/672/257; 126 blocks; top holder Rogers 29%; https://numberingdata.com/city/new-westminster-bc
- Newton, British Columbia: codes 604/778/236/257/672; 46 blocks; top holder Telus 50%; https://numberingdata.com/city/newton-bc
- North Vancouver, British Columbia: codes 604/778/672/236/257; 58 blocks; top holder VoIP providers 33%; https://numberingdata.com/city/north-vancouver-bc
- Parksville, British Columbia: codes 250/236/778/672; 23 blocks; top holder Telus 22%; https://numberingdata.com/city/parksville-bc
- Penticton, British Columbia: codes 250/236/778; 31 blocks; top holder Telus 29%; https://numberingdata.com/city/penticton-bc
- Port Alberni, British Columbia: codes 250/778/236; 17 blocks; top holder Telus 35%; https://numberingdata.com/city/port-alberni-bc
- Port Coquitlam, British Columbia: codes 604/778/236/672; 26 blocks; top holder Telus 46%; https://numberingdata.com/city/port-coquitlam-bc
- Port Moody, British Columbia: codes 604/778/236/672; 22 blocks; top holder Telus 45%; https://numberingdata.com/city/port-moody-bc
- Prince George, British Columbia: codes 250/778/236/672/257; 45 blocks; top holder Telus 29%; https://numberingdata.com/city/prince-george-bc
- Quesnel, British Columbia: codes 250/236/778; 18 blocks; top holder Telus 22%; https://numberingdata.com/city/quesnel-bc
- Richmond, British Columbia: codes 604/778/236/672/257; 73 blocks; top holder Telus 37%; https://numberingdata.com/city/richmond-bc
- Saanich, British Columbia: codes 250/236/778/672; 18 blocks; top holder Telus 44%; https://numberingdata.com/city/saanich-bc
- Salmon Arm, British Columbia: codes 236/250/778/672; 22 blocks; top holder Telus 27%; https://numberingdata.com/city/salmon-arm-bc
- South Kamloops, British Columbia: codes 250/778/236/672/257; 48 blocks; top holder Telus 27%; https://numberingdata.com/city/south-kamloops-bc
- Squamish, British Columbia: codes 604/778/672/236; 24 blocks; top holder Telus 29%; https://numberingdata.com/city/squamish-bc
- Terrace, British Columbia: codes 250/778/236/672; 16 blocks; top holder Telus 38%; https://numberingdata.com/city/terrace-bc
- Vancouver, British Columbia: codes 604/778/236/672/257; 746 blocks; top holder Telus 25%; https://numberingdata.com/city/vancouver-bc
- Vernon, British Columbia: codes 250/778/236/672/257; 37 blocks; top holder Telus 32%; https://numberingdata.com/city/vernon-bc
- Victoria, British Columbia: codes 250/778/672/236; 169 blocks; top holder Telus 32%; https://numberingdata.com/city/victoria-bc
- West Vancouver, British Columbia: codes 604/236/778/257/672; 31 blocks; top holder VoIP providers 29%; https://numberingdata.com/city/west-vancouver-bc
- Whalley, British Columbia: codes 604/778/236/672; 36 blocks; top holder Telus 44%; https://numberingdata.com/city/whalley-bc
- Whistler, British Columbia: codes 604/236/778; 28 blocks; top holder Telus 29%; https://numberingdata.com/city/whistler-bc
- White Rock, British Columbia: codes 604/778/236/672; 21 blocks; top holder Telus 48%; https://numberingdata.com/city/white-rock-bc
- Williams Lake, British Columbia: codes 250/778/236/672; 21 blocks; top holder Telus 29%; https://numberingdata.com/city/williams-lake-bc
- Brandon, Manitoba: codes 204/431; 38 blocks; top holder Other 61%; https://numberingdata.com/city/brandon-mb
- Dauphin, Manitoba: codes 204/431; 19 blocks; top holder Other 63%; https://numberingdata.com/city/dauphin-mb
- Oakbank, Manitoba: codes 204/431/584; 23 blocks; top holder VoIP providers 39%; https://numberingdata.com/city/oakbank-mb
- Portage La Prairie, Manitoba: codes 204/431/584; 34 blocks; top holder Other 35%; https://numberingdata.com/city/portage-la-prairie-mb
- Selkirk, Manitoba: codes 204/431; 19 blocks; top holder Other 58%; https://numberingdata.com/city/selkirk-mb
- Steinbach, Manitoba: codes 204/431; 24 blocks; top holder Other 58%; https://numberingdata.com/city/steinbach-mb
- Stonewall, Manitoba: codes 431/204/584; 21 blocks; top holder Other 29%; https://numberingdata.com/city/stonewall-mb
- Thompson, Manitoba: codes 204/431; 15 blocks; top holder Other 60%; https://numberingdata.com/city/thompson-mb
- Winkler, Manitoba: codes 204/431; 15 blocks; top holder Other 53%; https://numberingdata.com/city/winkler-mb
- Winnipeg, Manitoba: codes 204/431/584; 419 blocks; top holder Other 41%; https://numberingdata.com/city/winnipeg-mb
- Bathurst, New Brunswick: codes 506/428; 29 blocks; top holder Other 34%; https://numberingdata.com/city/bathurst-nb
- Campbellton, New Brunswick: codes 506; 16 blocks; top holder VoIP providers 25%; https://numberingdata.com/city/campbellton-nb
- Edmundston, New Brunswick: codes 506; 23 blocks; top holder Other 35%; https://numberingdata.com/city/edmundston-nb
- Fredericton, New Brunswick: codes 506; 55 blocks; top holder Other 38%; https://numberingdata.com/city/fredericton-nb
- Miramichi, New Brunswick: codes 506/428; 30 blocks; top holder Other 37%; https://numberingdata.com/city/miramichi-nb
- Moncton, New Brunswick: codes 506/428; 81 blocks; top holder Other 37%; https://numberingdata.com/city/moncton-nb
- Saint John, New Brunswick: codes 506/428; 79 blocks; top holder Other 46%; https://numberingdata.com/city/saint-john-nb
- Tracadie, New Brunswick: codes 506; 15 blocks; top holder Other 27%; https://numberingdata.com/city/tracadie-nb
- Woodstock, New Brunswick: codes 506/428; 16 blocks; top holder Other 25%; https://numberingdata.com/city/woodstock-nb
- Clarenville, Newfoundland and Labrador: codes 709; 15 blocks; top holder VoIP providers 33%; https://numberingdata.com/city/clarenville-nl
- Corner Brook, Newfoundland and Labrador: codes 709/879; 23 blocks; top holder Other 39%; https://numberingdata.com/city/corner-brook-nl
- St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador: codes 709/879; 102 blocks; top holder Other 37%; https://numberingdata.com/city/st-johns-nl
- Yellowknife, Northwest Territories: codes 867; 37 blocks; top holder Bell Mobility 38%; https://numberingdata.com/city/yellowknife-nt
- Amherst, Nova Scotia: codes 902/782; 27 blocks; top holder Other 22%; https://numberingdata.com/city/amherst-ns
- Antigonish, Nova Scotia: codes 902/782; 16 blocks; top holder VoIP providers 19%; https://numberingdata.com/city/antigonish-ns
- Bridgewater, Nova Scotia: codes 902/782; 22 blocks; top holder Other 27%; https://numberingdata.com/city/bridgewater-ns
- Chester, Nova Scotia: codes 902/782; 15 blocks; top holder Other 20%; https://numberingdata.com/city/chester-ns
- Halifax, Nova Scotia: codes 902/782; 222 blocks; top holder Other 37%; https://numberingdata.com/city/halifax-ns
- Kentville, Nova Scotia: codes 902/782; 25 blocks; top holder Other 24%; https://numberingdata.com/city/kentville-ns
- Liverpool, Nova Scotia: codes 782/902; 16 blocks; top holder Other 19%; https://numberingdata.com/city/liverpool-ns
- New Glasgow, Nova Scotia: codes 902/782; 27 blocks; top holder Other 41%; https://numberingdata.com/city/new-glasgow-ns
- Sydney, Nova Scotia: codes 902/782; 44 blocks; top holder Bell Mobility 27%; https://numberingdata.com/city/sydney-ns
- Truro, Nova Scotia: codes 902/782; 30 blocks; top holder Other 30%; https://numberingdata.com/city/truro-ns
- Windsor, Nova Scotia: codes 902/782; 28 blocks; top holder VoIP providers 43%; https://numberingdata.com/city/windsor-ns
- Yarmouth, Nova Scotia: codes 902/782; 21 blocks; top holder Other 33%; https://numberingdata.com/city/yarmouth-ns
- Ajax-Pickering, Ontario: codes 289/905/365/742; 78 blocks; top holder Rogers 18%; https://numberingdata.com/city/ajax-pickering-on
- Alliston, Ontario: codes 249/705/683; 24 blocks; top holder VoIP providers 25%; https://numberingdata.com/city/alliston-on
- Ancaster, Ontario: codes 289/365/905; 20 blocks; top holder Other 30%; https://numberingdata.com/city/ancaster-on
- Aurora, Ontario: codes 365/289/905/742; 49 blocks; top holder VoIP providers 27%; https://numberingdata.com/city/aurora-on
- Bancroft, Ontario: codes 343/613/753; 24 blocks; top holder Other 25%; https://numberingdata.com/city/bancroft-on
- Barrie, Ontario: codes 705/249/683; 96 blocks; top holder Rogers 21%; https://numberingdata.com/city/barrie-on
- Beeton, Ontario: codes 365/905/289/742; 15 blocks; top holder Rogers 27%; https://numberingdata.com/city/beeton-on
- Belleville, Ontario: codes 613/343/753; 55 blocks; top holder Bell 20%; https://numberingdata.com/city/belleville-on
- Bolton, Ontario: codes 289/365/905/742; 19 blocks; top holder Other 42%; https://numberingdata.com/city/bolton-on
- Bowmanville, Ontario: codes 365/289/905/742; 16 blocks; top holder VoIP providers 25%; https://numberingdata.com/city/bowmanville-on
- Bracebridge, Ontario: codes 705/249/683; 23 blocks; top holder Bell 17%; https://numberingdata.com/city/bracebridge-on
- Brampton, Ontario: codes 905/289/365/742; 116 blocks; top holder Bell 25%; https://numberingdata.com/city/brampton-on
- Brantford, Ontario: codes 226/519/548/382; 71 blocks; top holder Rogers 30%; https://numberingdata.com/city/brantford-on
- Brockville, Ontario: codes 343/613; 33 blocks; top holder Bell 21%; https://numberingdata.com/city/brockville-on
- Burlington, Ontario: codes 289/905/365/742; 65 blocks; top holder Bell 26%; https://numberingdata.com/city/burlington-on
- Caledon East, Ontario: codes 905/365/289/742; 17 blocks; top holder Other 41%; https://numberingdata.com/city/caledon-east-on
- Carleton Place, Ontario: codes 613/343/753; 23 blocks; top holder Other 22%; https://numberingdata.com/city/carleton-place-on
- Castlemore, Ontario: codes 365/905/289/742; 18 blocks; top holder Other 39%; https://numberingdata.com/city/castlemore-on
- Chatham, Ontario: codes 226/519/548/382; 52 blocks; top holder Rogers 19%; https://numberingdata.com/city/chatham-on
- Claremont, Ontario: codes 365/905/742/289; 15 blocks; top holder Other 40%; https://numberingdata.com/city/claremont-on
- Clarkson, Ontario: codes 289/905/365/742; 26 blocks; top holder Other 27%; https://numberingdata.com/city/clarkson-on
- Cobourg, Ontario: codes 289/905/365/742; 25 blocks; top holder VoIP providers 20%; https://numberingdata.com/city/cobourg-on
- Collingwood, Ontario: codes 249/705; 30 blocks; top holder Rogers 33%; https://numberingdata.com/city/collingwood-on
- Cooksville, Ontario: codes 905/289/365/742; 77 blocks; top holder Bell 49%; https://numberingdata.com/city/cooksville-on
- Cornwall, Ontario: codes 343/613/753; 46 blocks; top holder VoIP providers 22%; https://numberingdata.com/city/cornwall-on
- Dunnville, Ontario: codes 289/365/905; 28 blocks; top holder Rogers 43%; https://numberingdata.com/city/dunnville-on
- Espanola, Ontario: codes 249/705; 18 blocks; top holder VoIP providers 28%; https://numberingdata.com/city/espanola-on
- Essex, Ontario: codes 548/226/519/382; 17 blocks; top holder Other 35%; https://numberingdata.com/city/essex-on
- Fort Erie, Ontario: codes 289/365/905; 20 blocks; top holder Bell 25%; https://numberingdata.com/city/fort-erie-on
- Fort Frances, Ontario: codes 807; 17 blocks; top holder VoIP providers 29%; https://numberingdata.com/city/fort-frances-on
- Galt, Ontario: codes 226/519/548/382; 28 blocks; top holder Other 29%; https://numberingdata.com/city/galt-on
- Georgetown, Ontario: codes 289/365/905/742; 21 blocks; top holder Other 24%; https://numberingdata.com/city/georgetown-on
- Goderich, Ontario: codes 226/519/548; 20 blocks; top holder VoIP providers 20%; https://numberingdata.com/city/goderich-on
- Gormley, Ontario: codes 365/905/289/742; 16 blocks; top holder Other 44%; https://numberingdata.com/city/gormley-on
- Grimsby, Ontario: codes 289/365/905; 16 blocks; top holder Other 38%; https://numberingdata.com/city/grimsby-on
- Guelph, Ontario: codes 519/226/548; 72 blocks; top holder Rogers 19%; https://numberingdata.com/city/guelph-on
- Hamilton, Ontario: codes 905/289/365/742; 222 blocks; top holder Bell 22%; https://numberingdata.com/city/hamilton-on
- Hespeler, Ontario: codes 519/226/548/382; 44 blocks; top holder Bell 20%; https://numberingdata.com/city/hespeler-on
- Huntsville, Ontario: codes 249/705/683; 33 blocks; top holder Rogers 21%; https://numberingdata.com/city/huntsville-on
- Jockvale, Ontario: codes 343/613; 16 blocks; top holder Bell 31%; https://numberingdata.com/city/jockvale-on
- Kanata-Stittsville, Ontario: codes 613/343/753; 39 blocks; top holder Bell 26%; https://numberingdata.com/city/kanata-stittsville-on
- Kenora, Ontario: codes 807; 35 blocks; top holder Bell Mobility 69%; https://numberingdata.com/city/kenora-on
- Keswick, Ontario: codes 365/905/289/742; 15 blocks; top holder Other 40%; https://numberingdata.com/city/keswick-on
- King City, Ontario: codes 289/365/742/905; 17 blocks; top holder Other 41%; https://numberingdata.com/city/king-city-on
- Kingston, Ontario: codes 613/343/753; 84 blocks; top holder Bell 21%; https://numberingdata.com/city/kingston-on
- Kitchener-Waterloo, Ontario: codes 519/226/548/382; 166 blocks; top holder Rogers 22%; https://numberingdata.com/city/kitchener-waterloo-on
- Kleinburg, Ontario: codes 365/289/742/905; 16 blocks; top holder Other 38%; https://numberingdata.com/city/kleinburg-on
- Leamington, Ontario: codes 548/519/226; 22 blocks; top holder Other 23%; https://numberingdata.com/city/leamington-on
- Lindsay, Ontario: codes 705/249/683; 31 blocks; top holder Bell 19%; https://numberingdata.com/city/lindsay-on
- Listowel, Ontario: codes 548/226/519; 24 blocks; top holder Rogers 33%; https://numberingdata.com/city/listowel-on
- London, Ontario: codes 519/226/548/382; 220 blocks; top holder Rogers 28%; https://numberingdata.com/city/london-on
- Malton, Ontario: codes 905/289/365/742; 49 blocks; top holder Bell 33%; https://numberingdata.com/city/malton-on
- Maple, Ontario: codes 289/365/905/742; 28 blocks; top holder Rogers 25%; https://numberingdata.com/city/maple-on
- Markham, Ontario: codes 365/289/905/742; 82 blocks; top holder VoIP providers 60%; https://numberingdata.com/city/markham-on
- Midland, Ontario: codes 705/249/683; 21 blocks; top holder Bell 24%; https://numberingdata.com/city/midland-on
- Milton, Ontario: codes 289/905/365/742; 41 blocks; top holder Bell 20%; https://numberingdata.com/city/milton-on
- Mount Forest, Ontario: codes 548/519/226/382; 20 blocks; top holder Rogers 40%; https://numberingdata.com/city/mount-forest-on
- Newmarket, Ontario: codes 289/905/365/742; 62 blocks; top holder Rogers 21%; https://numberingdata.com/city/newmarket-on
- Niagara Falls, Ontario: codes 289/905/365/742; 36 blocks; top holder Bell 31%; https://numberingdata.com/city/niagara-falls-on
- North Bay, Ontario: codes 705/249/683; 44 blocks; top holder Bell 30%; https://numberingdata.com/city/north-bay-on
- Oak Ridges, Ontario: codes 289/905/365/742; 21 blocks; top holder Other 33%; https://numberingdata.com/city/oak-ridges-on
- Oakville, Ontario: codes 289/905/365; 90 blocks; top holder Bell 22%; https://numberingdata.com/city/oakville-on
- Orangeville, Ontario: codes 519/226/548; 28 blocks; top holder Bell 25%; https://numberingdata.com/city/orangeville-on
- Orillia, Ontario: codes 705/249/683; 27 blocks; top holder Bell 26%; https://numberingdata.com/city/orillia-on
- Orleans, Ontario: codes 613/343; 18 blocks; top holder Bell 33%; https://numberingdata.com/city/orleans-on
- Oshawa, Ontario: codes 905/289/365/742; 111 blocks; top holder Bell 20%; https://numberingdata.com/city/oshawa-on
- Ottawa-Hull, Ontario: codes 613/343/753; 447 blocks; top holder Bell 32%; https://numberingdata.com/city/ottawa-hull-on
- Owen Sound, Ontario: codes 519/226/548; 37 blocks; top holder Bell 24%; https://numberingdata.com/city/owen-sound-on
- Parry Sound, Ontario: codes 705/249/683; 18 blocks; top holder Bell 22%; https://numberingdata.com/city/parry-sound-on
- Pembroke, Ontario: codes 613/343; 22 blocks; top holder Bell 27%; https://numberingdata.com/city/pembroke-on
- Perth, Ontario: codes 613/343/753; 18 blocks; top holder Rogers 22%; https://numberingdata.com/city/perth-on
- Peterborough, Ontario: codes 705/249/683; 60 blocks; top holder Bell 23%; https://numberingdata.com/city/peterborough-on
- Port Credit, Ontario: codes 365/905/289/742; 22 blocks; top holder Other 27%; https://numberingdata.com/city/port-credit-on
- Richmond Hill, Ontario: codes 289/905/365/742; 46 blocks; top holder Other 22%; https://numberingdata.com/city/richmond-hill-on
- Sarnia, Ontario: codes 519/226/548; 52 blocks; top holder Bell 27%; https://numberingdata.com/city/sarnia-on
- Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario: codes 705/249; 45 blocks; top holder Bell 36%; https://numberingdata.com/city/sault-ste-marie-on
- Schomberg, Ontario: codes 365/289/905/742; 15 blocks; top holder Other 53%; https://numberingdata.com/city/schomberg-on
- Simcoe, Ontario: codes 519/226/548; 22 blocks; top holder Bell 27%; https://numberingdata.com/city/simcoe-on
- Smiths Falls, Ontario: codes 613/343; 25 blocks; top holder Other 24%; https://numberingdata.com/city/smiths-falls-on
- South Pickering, Ontario: codes 289/905/365/742; 22 blocks; top holder Bell 27%; https://numberingdata.com/city/south-pickering-on
- St. Catharines-Thorold, Ontario: codes 905/289/365/742; 107 blocks; top holder Bell 20%; https://numberingdata.com/city/st-catharines-thorold-on
- St. Thomas, Ontario: codes 548/226/519; 16 blocks; top holder VoIP providers 31%; https://numberingdata.com/city/st-thomas-on
- Stoney Creek, Ontario: codes 365/289/905; 21 blocks; top holder Other 33%; https://numberingdata.com/city/stoney-creek-on
- Stouffville, Ontario: codes 289/365/905/742; 17 blocks; top holder Other 41%; https://numberingdata.com/city/stouffville-on
- Stratford, Ontario: codes 226/519/548/382; 36 blocks; top holder Bell 19%; https://numberingdata.com/city/stratford-on
- Streetsville, Ontario: codes 905/289/365/742; 64 blocks; top holder Bell 36%; https://numberingdata.com/city/streetsville-on
- Sudbury, Ontario: codes 705/249; 75 blocks; top holder Bell 29%; https://numberingdata.com/city/sudbury-on
- Thornhill, Ontario: codes 905/365/289/742; 71 blocks; top holder VoIP providers 28%; https://numberingdata.com/city/thornhill-on
- Thunder Bay, Ontario: codes 807; 67 blocks; top holder Other 36%; https://numberingdata.com/city/thunder-bay-on
- Tillsonburg, Ontario: codes 226/519/548; 19 blocks; top holder VoIP providers 21%; https://numberingdata.com/city/tillsonburg-on
- Timmins, Ontario: codes 705/249/683; 27 blocks; top holder Other 37%; https://numberingdata.com/city/timmins-on
- Toronto, Ontario: codes 416/647/437/942; 2176 blocks; top holder Rogers 25%; https://numberingdata.com/city/toronto-on
- Unionville, Ontario: codes 905/289/365/742; 48 blocks; top holder Bell 35%; https://numberingdata.com/city/unionville-on
- Uxbridge, Ontario: codes 289/365/742/905; 17 blocks; top holder Other 41%; https://numberingdata.com/city/uxbridge-on
- Vankleek Hill, Ontario: codes 343/613/753; 15 blocks; top holder VoIP providers 20%; https://numberingdata.com/city/vankleek-hill-on
- Walkerton, Ontario: codes 226/519/548; 15 blocks; top holder VoIP providers 27%; https://numberingdata.com/city/walkerton-on
- Welland, Ontario: codes 289/905/365/742; 24 blocks; top holder Bell 29%; https://numberingdata.com/city/welland-on
- Whitby, Ontario: codes 289/905/365/742; 24 blocks; top holder Other 25%; https://numberingdata.com/city/whitby-on
- Windsor, Ontario: codes 519/226/548/382; 134 blocks; top holder Bell 22%; https://numberingdata.com/city/windsor-on
- Woodbridge, Ontario: codes 289/905/365/742; 30 blocks; top holder Other 27%; https://numberingdata.com/city/woodbridge-on
- Woodstock, Ontario: codes 226/519/548; 32 blocks; top holder VoIP providers 22%; https://numberingdata.com/city/woodstock-on
- Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island: codes 902/782; 55 blocks; top holder Other 29%; https://numberingdata.com/city/charlottetown-pe
- Summerside, Prince Edward Island: codes 902/782; 24 blocks; top holder Bell Mobility 33%; https://numberingdata.com/city/summerside-pe
- Alma, Quebec: codes 367/581/418; 48 blocks; top holder Telus Mobility 23%; https://numberingdata.com/city/alma-qc
- Amos, Quebec: codes 819/873; 22 blocks; top holder Other 32%; https://numberingdata.com/city/amos-qc
- Arthabaska, Quebec: codes 819/873/468; 15 blocks; top holder Other 40%; https://numberingdata.com/city/arthabaska-qc
- Baie-Comeau (Hauterive), Quebec: codes 418/581/367; 19 blocks; top holder Telus 32%; https://numberingdata.com/city/baie-comeau-hauterive-qc
- Beloeil, Quebec: codes 450/579; 17 blocks; top holder Videotron 29%; https://numberingdata.com/city/beloeil-qc
- Boucherville, Quebec: codes 450/579/354; 21 blocks; top holder Videotron 19%; https://numberingdata.com/city/boucherville-qc
- Buckingham, Quebec: codes 873/819; 15 blocks; top holder VoIP providers 33%; https://numberingdata.com/city/buckingham-qc
- Chambly, Quebec: codes 450/579/354; 16 blocks; top holder Videotron 25%; https://numberingdata.com/city/chambly-qc
- Chateauguay, Quebec: codes 450/579/354; 19 blocks; top holder Bell 26%; https://numberingdata.com/city/chateauguay-qc
- Chicoutimi, Quebec: codes 418/581/367; 64 blocks; top holder Bell Mobility 25%; https://numberingdata.com/city/chicoutimi-qc
- Chomedey, Quebec: codes 450/579; 33 blocks; top holder Bell 27%; https://numberingdata.com/city/chomedey-qc
- Donnacona, Quebec: codes 418/581/367; 21 blocks; top holder Telus 24%; https://numberingdata.com/city/donnacona-qc
- Drummondville, Quebec: codes 819/873/468; 45 blocks; top holder Bell 22%; https://numberingdata.com/city/drummondville-qc
- Gaspe, Quebec: codes 581/367/418; 16 blocks; top holder Telus 38%; https://numberingdata.com/city/gaspe-qc
- Gatineau, Quebec: codes 819/873; 28 blocks; top holder Videotron 21%; https://numberingdata.com/city/gatineau-qc
- Granby, Quebec: codes 450/579/354; 52 blocks; top holder Bell 19%; https://numberingdata.com/city/granby-qc
- Ile-Perrot, Quebec: codes 438/514/263; 28 blocks; top holder Other 29%; https://numberingdata.com/city/ile-perrot-qc
- Joliette, Quebec: codes 450/579/354; 48 blocks; top holder Bell 19%; https://numberingdata.com/city/joliette-qc
- Jonquiere, Quebec: codes 418/581/367; 17 blocks; top holder Bell 41%; https://numberingdata.com/city/jonquiere-qc
- L'Epiphanie-l'Assomption, Quebec: codes 579/450/354; 17 blocks; top holder Videotron 24%; https://numberingdata.com/city/lepiphanie-lassomption-qc
- La Malbaie, Quebec: codes 418/581/367; 18 blocks; top holder Videotron 28%; https://numberingdata.com/city/la-malbaie-qc
- Lac-Megantic, Quebec: codes 819/873/468; 20 blocks; top holder Videotron 25%; https://numberingdata.com/city/lac-megantic-qc
- Lachine, Quebec: codes 514/438/263; 38 blocks; top holder Other 29%; https://numberingdata.com/city/lachine-qc
- Lachute, Quebec: codes 579/450/354; 18 blocks; top holder Videotron 28%; https://numberingdata.com/city/lachute-qc
- Laprairie, Quebec: codes 450/579/354; 16 blocks; top holder Videotron 25%; https://numberingdata.com/city/laprairie-qc
- Laval-Est, Quebec: codes 579/450; 20 blocks; top holder VoIP providers 35%; https://numberingdata.com/city/laval-est-qc
- Laval-Ouest, Quebec: codes 450/579; 24 blocks; top holder VoIP providers 29%; https://numberingdata.com/city/laval-ouest-qc
- Le Gardeur, Quebec: codes 450/579; 16 blocks; top holder Bell 38%; https://numberingdata.com/city/le-gardeur-qc
- Levis, Quebec: codes 418/581/367; 25 blocks; top holder Bell 28%; https://numberingdata.com/city/levis-qc
- Longueuil, Quebec: codes 450/579/354; 41 blocks; top holder Bell 32%; https://numberingdata.com/city/longueuil-qc
- Loretteville, Quebec: codes 418/581/367; 18 blocks; top holder Bell 28%; https://numberingdata.com/city/loretteville-qc
- Magog, Quebec: codes 819/873/468; 15 blocks; top holder Bell 27%; https://numberingdata.com/city/magog-qc
- Maniwaki, Quebec: codes 873/819/468; 26 blocks; top holder Rogers 27%; https://numberingdata.com/city/maniwaki-qc
- Matane, Quebec: codes 581/418/367; 16 blocks; top holder Telus 38%; https://numberingdata.com/city/matane-qc
- Mont-Laurier, Quebec: codes 819/873/468; 17 blocks; top holder Videotron 29%; https://numberingdata.com/city/mont-laurier-qc
- Montmagny, Quebec: codes 418/581/367; 21 blocks; top holder Telus 29%; https://numberingdata.com/city/montmagny-qc
- Montreal, Quebec: codes 514/438/263; 1278 blocks; top holder Bell Mobility 23%; https://numberingdata.com/city/montreal-qc
- Ottawa-Hull, Quebec: codes 819/873/468; 123 blocks; top holder Bell 23%; https://numberingdata.com/city/ottawa-hull-qc
- Pointe-Claire, Quebec: codes 514/438/263; 40 blocks; top holder Other 28%; https://numberingdata.com/city/pointe-claire-qc
- Pont-Viau, Quebec: codes 450/579/354; 36 blocks; top holder Bell 28%; https://numberingdata.com/city/pont-viau-qc
- Quebec, Quebec: codes 418/581/367/273; 287 blocks; top holder Bell 23%; https://numberingdata.com/city/quebec-qc
- Rimouski, Quebec: codes 418/581/367; 38 blocks; top holder Telus 37%; https://numberingdata.com/city/rimouski-qc
- Riviere-du-Loup, Quebec: codes 418/581/367; 30 blocks; top holder Bell 27%; https://numberingdata.com/city/riviere-du-loup-qc
- Rouyn-Noranda, Quebec: codes 819/873/468; 25 blocks; top holder Other 36%; https://numberingdata.com/city/rouyn-noranda-qc
- Roxboro, Quebec: codes 514/438/263; 30 blocks; top holder Other 30%; https://numberingdata.com/city/roxboro-qc
- Saint-Georges-de-Beauce, Quebec: codes 418/581/367; 24 blocks; top holder Telus 38%; https://numberingdata.com/city/saint-georges-de-beauce-qc
- Saint-Henri-de-Levis, Quebec: codes 581/418/367; 16 blocks; top holder Telus 38%; https://numberingdata.com/city/saint-henri-de-levis-qc
- Sainte-Marie-de-Beauce, Quebec: codes 418/581/367; 26 blocks; top holder Videotron 23%; https://numberingdata.com/city/sainte-marie-de-beauce-qc
- Sept-Iles, Quebec: codes 418/581/367; 20 blocks; top holder Telus 40%; https://numberingdata.com/city/sept-iles-qc
- Shawinigan, Quebec: codes 819/873; 23 blocks; top holder Bell 26%; https://numberingdata.com/city/shawinigan-qc
- Sherbrooke, Quebec: codes 819/873/468; 109 blocks; top holder Bell Mobility 21%; https://numberingdata.com/city/sherbrooke-qc
- Sorel, Quebec: codes 450/579/354; 36 blocks; top holder Videotron 19%; https://numberingdata.com/city/sorel-qc
- St-Bruno, Quebec: codes 450/579; 16 blocks; top holder Videotron 25%; https://numberingdata.com/city/st-bruno-qc
- St-Constant, Quebec: codes 450/579/354; 15 blocks; top holder Videotron 40%; https://numberingdata.com/city/st-constant-qc
- St-Eustache, Quebec: codes 450/579/354; 23 blocks; top holder Bell 26%; https://numberingdata.com/city/st-eustache-qc
- St-Felicien, Quebec: codes 418/581/367; 19 blocks; top holder Bell 21%; https://numberingdata.com/city/st-felicien-qc
- St-Hyacinthe, Quebec: codes 450/579/354; 42 blocks; top holder Bell 19%; https://numberingdata.com/city/st-hyacinthe-qc
- St-Jean, Quebec: codes 450/579/354; 35 blocks; top holder Bell 29%; https://numberingdata.com/city/st-jean-qc
- St-Jerome, Quebec: codes 450/579/354; 47 blocks; top holder Bell 23%; https://numberingdata.com/city/st-jerome-qc
- St-Jovite, Quebec: codes 819/873/468; 16 blocks; top holder Telus 25%; https://numberingdata.com/city/st-jovite-qc
- St-Lambert, Quebec: codes 450/579/354; 37 blocks; top holder Bell 41%; https://numberingdata.com/city/st-lambert-qc
- St-Sauveur, Quebec: codes 450/579/354; 15 blocks; top holder Videotron 27%; https://numberingdata.com/city/st-sauveur-qc
- St-Vincent-de-Paul, Quebec: codes 450/579/354; 17 blocks; top holder Other 18%; https://numberingdata.com/city/st-vincent-de-paul-qc
- Ste-Agathe, Quebec: codes 819/873/468; 21 blocks; top holder Bell 24%; https://numberingdata.com/city/ste-agathe-qc
- Ste-Genevieve, Quebec: codes 514/438/263; 33 blocks; top holder Other 27%; https://numberingdata.com/city/ste-genevieve-qc
- Ste-Rose, Quebec: codes 450/579/354; 22 blocks; top holder Bell 27%; https://numberingdata.com/city/ste-rose-qc
- Ste-Therese, Quebec: codes 450/579/354; 38 blocks; top holder Bell 32%; https://numberingdata.com/city/ste-therese-qc
- Terrebonne, Quebec: codes 450/579/354; 18 blocks; top holder Bell 28%; https://numberingdata.com/city/terrebonne-qc
- Thetford Mines, Quebec: codes 418/581/367; 28 blocks; top holder Bell 25%; https://numberingdata.com/city/thetford-mines-qc
- Trois-Rivieres, Quebec: codes 819/873/468; 71 blocks; top holder Bell 30%; https://numberingdata.com/city/trois-rivieres-qc
- Val-D'Or, Quebec: codes 819/873/468; 28 blocks; top holder Other 29%; https://numberingdata.com/city/val-dor-qc
- Valleyfield, Quebec: codes 450/579/354; 34 blocks; top holder Bell 24%; https://numberingdata.com/city/valleyfield-qc
- Victoriaville, Quebec: codes 819/873/468; 29 blocks; top holder Bell 21%; https://numberingdata.com/city/victoriaville-qc
- Biggar, Saskatchewan: codes 639/306/474; 16 blocks; top holder VoIP providers 31%; https://numberingdata.com/city/biggar-sk
- Davidson, Saskatchewan: codes 639/306/474; 15 blocks; top holder VoIP providers 27%; https://numberingdata.com/city/davidson-sk
- Estevan, Saskatchewan: codes 306/639; 15 blocks; top holder SaskTel 60%; https://numberingdata.com/city/estevan-sk
- Fort Qu'Appelle, Saskatchewan: codes 306/639; 15 blocks; top holder SaskTel 33%; https://numberingdata.com/city/fort-quappelle-sk
- Kipling, Saskatchewan: codes 639/306/474; 16 blocks; top holder SaskTel 31%; https://numberingdata.com/city/kipling-sk
- Lanigan, Saskatchewan: codes 306/639/474; 15 blocks; top holder SaskTel 27%; https://numberingdata.com/city/lanigan-sk
- Moose Jaw, Saskatchewan: codes 639/306; 52 blocks; top holder Rogers 58%; https://numberingdata.com/city/moose-jaw-sk
- Moosomin, Saskatchewan: codes 306/639/474; 17 blocks; top holder SaskTel 29%; https://numberingdata.com/city/moosomin-sk
- North Battleford, Saskatchewan: codes 306/639; 22 blocks; top holder SaskTel 64%; https://numberingdata.com/city/north-battleford-sk
- Outlook, Saskatchewan: codes 306/639/474; 17 blocks; top holder SaskTel 47%; https://numberingdata.com/city/outlook-sk
- Prince Albert, Saskatchewan: codes 306/639; 29 blocks; top holder SaskTel 59%; https://numberingdata.com/city/prince-albert-sk
- Regina, Saskatchewan: codes 306/639/474; 163 blocks; top holder SaskTel 42%; https://numberingdata.com/city/regina-sk
- Saskatoon, Saskatchewan: codes 306/639/474; 134 blocks; top holder SaskTel 49%; https://numberingdata.com/city/saskatoon-sk
- Swift Current, Saskatchewan: codes 306/639; 18 blocks; top holder SaskTel 56%; https://numberingdata.com/city/swift-current-sk
- Weyburn, Saskatchewan: codes 306/639; 16 blocks; top holder SaskTel 56%; https://numberingdata.com/city/weyburn-sk
- Yorkton, Saskatchewan: codes 306/639; 19 blocks; top holder SaskTel 58%; https://numberingdata.com/city/yorkton-sk
- Whitehorse, Yukon: codes 867; 30 blocks; top holder VoIP providers 43%; https://numberingdata.com/city/whitehorse-yt

## Reports

### Which North American area codes are running out of numbers
169 codes are at or past 95% of capacity and 31 have nothing left at all – but only 3 of them have relief planning open
Published 2026-11-01. https://numberingdata.com/reports/running-out-of-numbers

### Who actually holds America's phone numbers
All 198,747 assigned US number blocks, counted by holder: the three national carriers hold 52.1% of the stock, but their share of new assignments dropped to 27.5% in 2019 and has climbed back to 55.1% since
Published 2026-11-01. https://numberingdata.com/reports/who-holds-the-numbers

### Pooling: the rule that stopped area codes running out
142,720 of 198,747 assigned blocks – 71.8% – are shared between carriers in 1,000-number lots instead of being held whole
Published 2026-11-01. https://numberingdata.com/reports/thousands-block-pooling

### Two administrators, two sets of rules: Canada and the US inside one numbering plan
Same country codes, same dialing, but a Canadian area code holds 800 blocks against 786 in the US – and 5.5% of complaint caller IDs are Canadian codes
Published 2026-11-01. https://numberingdata.com/reports/canada-and-the-us

### Rate centers: the map underneath the area code
24,301 rate centers hold the 198,747 assigned US blocks – and 8.8% of those blocks sit in metro zones whose names are not places at all
Published 2026-11-01. https://numberingdata.com/reports/rate-centers

### The 50 most complained-about US area codes
What 282,276 FTC complaints say about which area codes spammers imitate – and why the big-city codes are not at the top
Published 2026-11-01. https://numberingdata.com/reports/most-complained-about-area-codes

### Spam calls are arriving from area codes that do not exist
Sixteen of the area codes appearing in FTC complaint caller IDs have never been assigned to anyone – including 555, the code reserved for fiction
Published 2026-11-01. https://numberingdata.com/reports/area-codes-that-do-not-exist

## Methodology, verbatim

## What this site is built from

Every number on this site comes from one of three places, and each page names the ones it used with the date they were retrieved.

**NANPA – the North American Numbering Plan Administrator.** Two files:
the NPA Database (`npa_report.csv`), which lists every area code with its state or province, in-service date, overlay complex, dialing plan and relief-planning status;
and the CO Code Assignment Records, which list every assigned NXX number block with the carrier that holds it and its rate center.
These are the authoritative records of how North American phone numbering is allocated. Our copy was retrieved on 1 November 2026, when the NANPA files carried file date 11/01/2026.

**FTC – Do Not Call Reported Calls Data.** Daily files of consumer complaints, including the phone number shown in the caller ID. We aggregated 25 daily files covering 28 Sep – 30 Oct 2026 – 282,276 complaints.

**Our own lookups and user reports.** Line type and current carrier for an individual number come from a carrier-lookup API at the moment you search. User reports are submitted through this site and reviewed by a person before they appear.

## What the numbers mean, and do not mean

**Carrier share is share of number blocks, not of people.** When a page says Verizon holds 86.9% of area code 212, that means Verizon was allocated 86.9% of the NXX blocks in that code. It does not mean 86.9% of people with a 212 number are Verizon customers – numbers move between carriers when people port them, and NANPA records do not track that.

**Complaint counts are about spoofed caller IDs.** Spam callers routinely fake the number they display, and a local-looking number gets answered more often. So when an area code ranks high in FTC complaints, the honest reading is that the code is *imitated* often. It is not evidence that the calls originate there, and it is not a judgement about people who have numbers in that code.

**Rate centers are telephone geography, not places.** In large metros the rate center is a zone code: Manhattan appears as NWYRCYZN01, Los Angeles as LSAN DA 01, Chicago as CHICGOZN01. We show these as NANPA records them rather than guessing at neighbourhood names. Smaller codes do give real place names, and we use them.

## Known gaps, stated plainly

- **The FTC complaint window is five weeks, not a year.** The FTC publishes only about five weeks of daily files at a time. Every complaint figure on this site is for 28 Sep – 30 Oct 2026 and is labelled with that window. Longer history needs the FTC's API, which we have not yet pulled.
- **Carrier pages are not published.** Insurance deductibles, claim deadlines and support numbers have to be read off each carrier's own current terms. Until a person has verified a figure against the carrier's document, the page stays unpublished rather than carrying an estimate. A wrong deductible is a wrong answer about someone's money.
- **Neighbourhood detail for big metros is missing**, because of the rate-center zone codes described above. Mapping zones to neighbourhoods needs a source we do not have yet.
- **Canadian coverage is thinner than US coverage.** NANPA records Canadian codes but the CO Code Assignment files we use cover US states, so Canadian pages currently lack number-block and carrier detail.

## How often this is refreshed

NANPA's files are regenerated daily and we re-import them weekly; an area code's page shows the date its data was verified. FTC files are published each weekday and we re-aggregate them weekly. Any page carrying a figure older than 45 days is pulled from the index until it is re-checked.

## What we do not publish

We do not publish names, addresses or any attempt to identify who holds a phone number. A lookup here returns carrier, line type, region and complaint history – nothing that identifies a person. We are not a people-search service and we do not link to one.

## Editorial policy – when a page is published and when it is held back

## A page exists only when it can answer the question

This site is generated from datasets, which makes it easy to produce thousands of pages that say almost nothing. We do not do that. Each page type has a minimum set of facts it must carry, and a page that cannot be filled from verified sources is not generated at all – it does not appear in the site, the sitemap or the search index.

For an area code in service, that minimum is: state or province, in-service date, number-block allocation, carrier share, complaint history for a stated window, and a source list with dates. For a code that has been assigned but is not yet live, it is: the parent code, the overlay complex, what will change when it starts, and the NANPA record proving it exists.

## Figures come from the source, not from inference

Where a figure can be read off a primary record, we read it off the record and cite it. Where it cannot, the page says so. We do not fill a gap with a plausible number, an industry average, or a figure from an aggregator that does not say where it got it.

This rule has cost us pages. The carrier insurance section is unpublished for exactly this reason.

## Corrections

If a figure here is wrong, we want to know and we will fix it with the date of the change shown on the page. [Request a correction](/corrections).

## Who writes this

Pages carry the name of the person who verified them. Automated generation fills the structure; a person checks the facts against the sources before a section is published.

## Money

We do not take payment to include, exclude or rank a carrier, and no carrier reviews these pages. Where a page links to a carrier or insurer, it links to that company's own official page, and we say in the page when we earn nothing from it. If that ever changes, the disclosure will be on the page itself and not only here.

## About, verbatim

## What this is

NumberingData is a reference for North American phone numbering. For any area code it answers the questions people actually ask: where is it, how full is it, who holds the numbers, is a call from it likely to be spam, and is a new code coming.

Everything on it is built from primary records – the numbering administrators' own files and the FTC's complaint data – and every page names the sources it used with the date they were retrieved.

## Who runs it

This is an independent project: a reference built from public records, not a company selling anything. Nobody pays to be included, excluded or ranked here, there is no advertising, and no carrier or regulator reviews these pages before they go up.

What stands behind a figure here is not an institution but a method you can repeat: every page names the file it came from and the date it was retrieved, the aggregates are published as downloads, and the code that produces them does the same thing every time it runs. If a number here disagrees with the source, the source wins – [tell us](/corrections) and the page gets a dated correction.

## Where the numbers come from

- **NANPA** – the North American Numbering Plan Administrator. Its NPA Database records every US area code; its CO Code Assignment Records record every assigned block of numbers and the carrier holding it.
- **CNA** – the Canadian Numbering Administrator, which does the same job for Canada. Canada is administered separately, so Canadian figures come from a different file with different conventions.
- **FTC** – the Federal Trade Commission's Do Not Call complaint data, which is what consumers report about unwanted calls.

## What we deliberately do not do

**We do not identify people.** A lookup here returns carrier, line type, region and complaint history. It never returns a name or an address, we do not build profiles, and we do not link to services that do.

**We do not publish a figure we have not verified.** Insurance deductibles and claim deadlines are things people act on with their own money. A carrier page goes live only after a person has read the current terms on that carrier's own site. The alternative – filling gaps with industry averages or numbers copied from aggregators – produces pages that look authoritative and are wrong.

**We do not treat complaint counts as proof.** Spam callers fake the number they display. A heavily complained-about area code is one that gets imitated, not one whose residents are calling you.

## Corrections

If something here is wrong, [tell us](/corrections) and we will fix it with a dated note on the page.

We do not host user reports about individual numbers. Publishing one person's claim about someone else's number needs a moderator reading every submission and answering removal requests the same week, and a reference site run this way has nobody to do that. The lookup tool still tells you the carrier, the line type and what the public complaint data says about the area code – none of which is anybody's accusation.

## Corrections

If a figure here contradicts a primary source, the primary source is right. Write to hello@numberingdata.com and we will fix it with a dated note on the page.